Abuse is no substitute for argument. If you have nothing philosophical to say then say nothing.

You changed my mind. I know am your follower.

Physical possibility or impossibility tells us something about the physical universe.

For it to be meaningful to talk about something being physically possible or impossible it must already be logically possible.

I'll kick your ass in a debate any day. You know that, I'm guessing, which is why you refuse to enter the ring.

therefore it cannot be physically shown that 5 does equal 4

lol you guys need a sitcom

Stop trying to derail this thread because you're both too cowardly to be shown wrong. Answer my question.

Stop trying to derail this thread because you're both too cowardly to be shown wrong. Answer my question.

you pretty much said that evidence can't prove something is physically impossible while not realizing you have no evidence for this, and, in fact, you can't use evidence since using evidence(apparently) cannot prove the opposite to be impossible according to your theory

thus the flaw in your logic.

Really?




the self-refuting nature of your theory has already been shown what question would you like answered?

how 1+1=2? well if I have one item and then a second item then if I hold up one finger to represent the one item and then I hold up another finger to represent the second item I can then count how many fingers I'm holding up to discover I'm holding up 2.

My chimp just told me that you were already proven wrong and that the same things have been said you like 5 times yet you act like they dont exist and then think you are winning the debate. (You either disregard reasons for your position to be wrong (there are many reasons) but your favorite is misrepresenting what someone said, evne though they said something incredibly simply and plainly.) My Chimp Bob also thinks that the rain drop analogy is idiotic because the definition of a drop is "The smallest quantity of liquid heavy enough to fall in a spherical mass" My chimp Bob Pointed out that when two drops become one there is no longer a drop because they are no longer the smallest quantity possible.

My chimp is taking over this debate by storm. His master already beat Night Ripper but Bob chimp is taking it for a whirl.

Really?




the self-refuting nature of your theory has already been shown what question would you like answered?

how 1+1=2? well if I have one item and then a second item, then if I hold up one finger to represent the one item and then I hold up another finger to represent the second item, I can count how many fingers I'm holding up and will discover I'm holding up 2.

If I add one raindrop and a second raindrop I get one raindrop, slightly bigger. What about that?

1atom + 1atom ='s 2 atoms there is no combining to form 1 big atom

You have a chimp? Well, I have a horse. The problem with my horse is that instead of engaging in logical arguments he makes incoherent vague appeals to science and then appeals to ridicule by braying out laughter like a regular jackass.

Needless to say, he's amusing but not very informative.

Bob chimp that thinks anything would be vague for someone who apparently can't read. Bob chimp thinks this is the only explenation for someone who hasnt responded to anything said that easily refutes the ripper's position.

Bob chimp is wondering if you are intelligent the implications of scientific laws. Bob chimp is also wondering if you understand that bob chimp is satire directed at YOU. Bob chimp thinks ripper copying an idea is ironic because it is making fun of the person writing. Bob chimp likes this but it also is funny. All in all Bob chimp thinks it also shows much dullness.

If I add one raindrop and a second raindrop I get one raindrop, slightly bigger. What about that?

You have to be joking. Have you ever read a science book, ever?

Nuclear fusion - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

you are missing the point irregardless