@Night Ripper,
Night Ripper;145976 wrote:And of course this just means you are avoiding the fact that I am claiming logical impossibility not physical impossibility. Therefore there is no inconsistency in what I'm saying.
It's logically impossible to test for physical impossibility. That's not a contradiction at all.
please elaborate on how it's logically impossible to test for physical impossibility?
I can think of one test right off the bat.....is what I want to physically test for(for example say I want to test if humans can breathe underwater) logically impossible? If so, then it's also physically impossible. If not, then some other test is required.
In order to disprove the statement it's logically impossible to test for physical impossibility one needs but to ask, "in any given situation can anything be ruled out, ever?" If even 1 thing can be ruled out then it is physically impossible for that thing to be responsible for said situation.
Obviously if you were to suddenly stub your toe and an investigation was launched I think we can both agree that I can be ruled out as a suspect as I am nowhere near you nor do I know you.
I think the thing you're missing is that physical impossibilities stem from the confines of the world we live in and the physical/natural laws that govern existence. Due to the laws of nature being what they are, certain things are physically impossible.