The problem with perspectivism

Get Email Updates Email this Topic Print this Page

Violent Meme
 
Reply Wed 24 Jun, 2009 08:31 am
@kennethamy,
So a "perspective" is an 'opinion' that is not yet true or false; but it will definitely-become true or false if people give it just a little bit more time???

A "perspective" is an "opinion waiting for approval to become an opinion"?
 
kennethamy
 
Reply Wed 24 Jun, 2009 08:38 am
@Violent Meme,
Violent Meme;71727 wrote:
So a "perspective" is an 'opinion' that is not yet true or false; but it will definitely-become true or false if people give it just a little bit more time???

A "perspective" is an "opinion waiting for approval to become an opinion"?


I guess you will have to ask the "perspectivists". Although from what I can tell, none of them have a very clear understanding of the term either. It is one of those terms that gain reputation by being vague, but by seeming profound.

How could an opinion "become true". It is either true or false, but we can get to know whether it is true or false in time, by continuing to gather evidence for whether it is true or false. But the evidence for an opinion does not make the opinion true, it may, however help us to know whether the opinion is true.
 
Violent Meme
 
Reply Wed 24 Jun, 2009 08:43 am
@kennethamy,
kennethamy;71728 wrote:
I guess you will have to ask the "perspectivists". Although from what I can tell, none of them have a very clear understanding of the term either. It is one of those terms that gain reputation by being vague, but by seeming profound.

How could an opinion "become true". It is either true or false, but we can get to know whether it is true or false in time, by continuing to gather evidence for whether it is true or false. But the evidence for an opinion does not make the opinion true, it may, however help us to know whether the opinion is true.

That makes sense to me, perhaps others as well...?
 
Satan phil
 
Reply Wed 24 Jun, 2009 08:45 am
@kennethamy,
kennethamy;71723 wrote:
I thought that perspectives cannot be true or false, but, certainly, opinions are true or false. In my opinion, Earth is the third planet. Isn't that true?


Only if you use the word opinion as a synonym for belief, much like a doctor gives you his professional "opinion". Though I think that's a misnomer because whether or not you have a certain disease is not just an opinion, it's a fact. Either you have lupus or you don't. An opinion cannot appeal to facts. That's what makes it an opinion. Engineers don't sit around swapping opinions about how wide a river channel is. They measure it.

Similarly, you believe that the Earth is the third planet from the Sun but it's not an opinion. It either is or it isn't the third planet. There's some fact about the universe that makes your belief true or false.

Contrast that to a belief that "classical music is awful". That's merely an opinion because there is no fact that we can appeal to. Even if everyone believed classical music is awful, that's still only a consensus, not a fact. We don't get to vote on facts (other than facts about how we vote after "the fact").
 
jgweed
 
Reply Wed 24 Jun, 2009 08:52 am
@hue-man,
Perhaps some clarification would be helpful.

Perspectivalism is not a doctrine of being; to be consistent, it is not an ontology except insofar as its position is that "real" or "absolute" being cannot be know with any certainty.
It is a theory of epistemology that investigates the various ways of knowing and their appropriateness to whatever is to be known, and the structures (and their genealogy) by which we understand the world. Consequently, it recognizes the multivocality of "truth" and "falsehood" when it is applied to judgments in various perspectives.
As with many properly philosophical terms, it uses an ordinary word in a very philosophical way that both includes the history and connotation of the word, but also brings to it a different and specialised sense.
It does not limit itself to "opinion," i.e., an individual's point of view, but includes collective perspectives as well. In the latter sense, one could provide the example of science as one kind of perspective and formal logic as another.
 
kennethamy
 
Reply Wed 24 Jun, 2009 08:53 am
@Satan phil,
Satan;71733 wrote:
Only if you use the word opinion as a synonym for belief, much like a doctor gives you his professional "opinion". Though I think that's a misnomer because whether or not you have a certain disease is not just an opinion, it's a fact. Either you have lupus or you don't. An opinion cannot appeal to facts. That's what makes it an opinion. Engineers don't sit around swapping opinions about how wide a river channel is. They measure it.

Similarly, you believe that the Earth is the third planet from the Sun but it's not an opinion. It either is or it isn't the third planet. There's some fact about the universe that makes your belief true or false.

Contrast that to a belief that "classical music is awful". That's merely an opinion because there is no fact that we can appeal to. Even if everyone believed classical music is awful, that's still only a consensus, not a fact. We don't get to vote on facts (other than facts about how we vote after "the fact").


Why can't you have an opinion about whether something is a fact or not (true or not)? I think you may be confusing opinions with something else, matters of opinion. A matter of opinion like whether strawberry ice-cream tastes better than vanilla, is a matter of opinion because there is no true or false about it. But when a physician gives his opinion that the kid has measles, that is either true or false, and is not just a matter of opinion. If you can support you opinion with evidence or reasons, then it is not just a matter of opinion. A person can often support his opinions (say) about classical music.
 
richrf
 
Reply Wed 24 Jun, 2009 08:53 am
@Violent Meme,
Violent Meme;71727 wrote:
So a "perspective" is an 'opinion' that is not yet true or false; but it will definitely-become true or false if people give it just a little bit more time???

A "perspective" is an "opinion waiting for approval to become an opinion"?


Hi,

This is how I view it:

My perspective is based upon what I can sense or feel from my position in the universe - my own particular space/time coordinates. Someone standing right next to me will have a different perspective. In other words, everyone senses something different and will form opinions upon what they sense and the skills that they have developed.

Since, we all have to exist in this world within relationships, we share each others perspective and form a consensus within one or more relationship. Nothing is necessarily true, but any given person, can claim that their perspective is the one that is true. Then you have disagreements and arguments - which are just part of Life. Smile

Rich
 
Violent Meme
 
Reply Wed 24 Jun, 2009 08:56 am
@jgweed,
jgweed;71737 wrote:
It does not limit itself to "opinion," i.e., an individual's point of view, but includes collective perspectives as well. In the latter sense, one could provide the example of science as one kind of perspective and formal logic as another.

Is science "opinionated"?

Is formal logic "opinionated"?

Or are they just all matters of "perspective"?


What is the difference? (...if there is a difference to begin with)
 
Satan phil
 
Reply Wed 24 Jun, 2009 08:56 am
@kennethamy,
kennethamy;71738 wrote:
Why can't you have an opinion about whether something is a fact or not (true or not)?


Whether or not something is a fact, is a fact, not an opinion. That's why.
 
richrf
 
Reply Wed 24 Jun, 2009 08:59 am
@Satan phil,
Satan;71733 wrote:
Only if you use the word opinion as a synonym for belief, much like a doctor gives you his professional "opinion". Though I think that's a misnomer because whether or not you have a certain disease is not just an opinion, it's a fact. Either you have lupus or you don't.


Physicians come up with different diagnosis all the time. In the last go around, my friend was diagnosed in four different ways by four different physicians and was prescribed four different treatments. And that is the way of the world.

Quote:
An opinion cannot appeal to facts. That's what makes it an opinion. Engineers don't sit around swapping opinions about how wide a river channel is. They measure it.


I think you will find that engineers will often come up with different measurements depending upon 1) who is measuring (measurements are dependent upon the person that is measuring), 2) what is decided should be measured, 3) the instruments being used, etc. There are many, many variables.

As in everything in life, the moment a human gets involved you have a whole new set of variables (e.g. skills, senses, opinions, approach, etc.), that yields distinct results.

Vive la difference!

Rich
 
kennethamy
 
Reply Wed 24 Jun, 2009 09:00 am
@richrf,
richrf;71739 wrote:
Hi,

This is how I view it:

My perspective is based upon what I can sense or feel from my position in the universe - my own particular space/time coordinates. Someone standing right next to me will have a different perspective. In other words, everyone senses something different and will form opinions upon what they sense and the skills that they have developed.

Since, we all have to exist in this world within relationships, we share each others perspective and form a consensus within one or more relationship. Nothing is necessarily true, but any given person, can claim that their perspective is the one that is true. Then you have disagreements and arguments - which are just part of Life. Smile

Rich


It isn't necessarily true that all dogs are animals? What could a dog be if not an animal? I wonder how tolerant you would be of the perspectives of other, if the perspective of the man next to you happened to be that you were evil and inferior, and that the best thing for him to do is to cut off your head. He certainly can (and probably does) claim that his perspective is true. And, from your perspective, as you tell it here, you will probably agree with him. So, don't worry about it. You can form a consensus with him, and stretch out your neck in brotherhood. Some people might point out that being tolerant of evil and idiocy is, itself, evil and intolerant of reason and rationality.
 
richrf
 
Reply Wed 24 Jun, 2009 09:01 am
@Satan phil,
Satan;71741 wrote:
Whether or not something is a fact, is a fact, not an opinion. That's why.


Those who suggest that each perspective is unique will differ. This thread is an example of different perspectives. Smile

Rich

---------- Post added at 10:04 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:01 AM ----------

kennethamy;71743 wrote:
It isn't necessarily true that all dogs are animals? What could a dog be if not an animal? I wonder how tolerant you would be of the perspectives of other, if the perspective of the man next to you happened to be that you were evil and inferior, and that the best thing for him to do is to cut off your head. He certainly can (and probably does) claim that his perspective is true. And, from your perspective, as you tell it here, you will probably agree with him. So, don't worry about it. You can form a consensus with him, and stretch out your neck in brotherhood.


Sometimes I agree and sometimes I disagree. Just because I understand perspective, doesn't mean I just cave in.

For example, the credit card companies constantly try to hit me with fees. I understand their perspective. They want as much of my money as they can get from me. Well, heck, that doesn't mean they are going to get it without a heck of a fight from me!

Talking to many pet owners, I understand that they may have a totally different perspective of their pets than I might have. I understand it. Everyone sees things differently, thus we have conflicts, thus we have change. Right out of Heraclitus.

Rich
 
Satan phil
 
Reply Wed 24 Jun, 2009 09:09 am
@richrf,
richrf;71742 wrote:
Physicians come up with different diagnosis all the time. In the last go around, my friend was diagnosed in four different ways by four different physicians and was prescribed four different treatments. And that is the way of the world.



I think you will find that engineers will often come up with different measurements depending upon 1) who is measuring (measurements are dependent upon the person that is measuring), 2) what is decided should be measured, 3) the instruments being used, etc. There are many, many variables.

As in everything in life, the moment a human gets involved you have a whole new set of variables (e.g. skills, senses, opinions, approach, etc.), that yields distinct results.

Vive la difference!

Rich


You can have any belief you like about how a car will affect you if you stand in traffic but the solipsists always lose in a head-on collision with reality.

That's a fact.
 
richrf
 
Reply Wed 24 Jun, 2009 09:15 am
@Satan phil,
Satan;71747 wrote:
You can have any belief you like about how a car will affect you if you stand in traffic but the solipsists always lose in a head-on collision with reality.

That's a fact.


Actually not. There are cases where people survive. I like watching shows on the History Channel, where people do things that scientists say are impossible, yet they happen under laboratory conditions. Unusual things happen as people evolve.

I have learned to live with consensus and probabilities. Others need facts and truth. Both are OK for me. The problem comes in when someone speaks a fact (e.g. when someone has Lupus it is a fact), and I feel this just a perspective that I have observed is not the case in many cases. Then there is a disagreement because of different perspectives. Disagreements sometimes can cause lots of problems. I try to handle them by understanding the other person's perspective.

Rich
 
Satan phil
 
Reply Wed 24 Jun, 2009 09:17 am
@richrf,
richrf;71749 wrote:
There are cases where people survive.


So what? They still got hit by a car regardless of their beliefs. You seem to be avoiding a very obvious truth.
 
richrf
 
Reply Wed 24 Jun, 2009 09:19 am
@Satan phil,
Satan;71751 wrote:
So what? They still got hit by a car regardless of their beliefs. You seem to be avoiding a very obvious truth.


I understand your perspective. It is just that I do not find them to be true from my perspective. Everyone sees things differently. As one poster pointed out in another post, humans in general only see a small portion of the light spectrum, and even within that portion, each person has a different degree of sensitivity. Ditto for all of the other senses and feelings. I just accept it.

Rich
 
Satan phil
 
Reply Wed 24 Jun, 2009 09:24 am
@richrf,
richrf;71752 wrote:
I understand your perspective. It is just that I do not find them to be true from my perspective.

Rich


Fast moving metal objects do not care about your perspective.

That's an inescapable fact that does not require belief.
 
richrf
 
Reply Wed 24 Jun, 2009 09:31 am
@Satan phil,
Satan;71753 wrote:
Fast moving metal objects do not care about your perspective.

That's an inescapable fact that does not require belief.


Yes, this is a thought that is formed via experience (maybe some of it inherited). As a former N.Y.C pedestrian, I have learned to avoid them because of the high probability of injury. Interestingly, I use to notice how some people were willing to take on much more risk because they judged the risks worth the potential costs -.e. g. taxi drivers. To each his own.

Rich
 
nameless
 
Reply Wed 24 Jun, 2009 11:10 am
@Violent Meme,
Violent Meme;71684 wrote:
*PERSONAL INSULT*

Actually, nameless, I am not "clueless" at all, thank you very much!

I know exactly-what I am talking about, always.

Isn't that exciting. No one else does, though, if you have your own meanings for words.
What does 'blue' mean to you?
How about 'house'?
Perhaps you'll write your own dictionarey some day..
Then we can read it and we can have an intelligent conversation.
Until then, you are alone in your sandbox.

Quote:
Then I pity you, that you must rely on a Dictionary for your Knowledge.

Your bloated ego aside, a dictionary is for 'education' for 'communication'. Thats what it is for. You use words like ever... jeez, what the hell am I wasting time with you. We cant even discuss 'perspective' because you are clueless as to the meaning (outside your own little sandbox!).

Quote:
You see, I first learned to read, speak, and understand words from my mother and father, not a Dictionary.

Perhaps they were as ignorant as you?

Quote:
And they learned from their mothers and fathers.

I repeat for them to.

Quote:
Try again, nameless

... don't think so.
nameless out
 
Violent Meme
 
Reply Wed 24 Jun, 2009 02:57 pm
@nameless,
nameless;71780 wrote:
Isn't that exciting. No one else does, though, if you have your own meanings for words.

That is not true at all.

You should take a course in logic.

Flip to your logic dictionary and look-up a "necessary truth". Read it.

:a-ok:


nameless;71780 wrote:
What does 'blue' mean to you?
How about 'house'?

Are you asking me because you want to know?

Or, are you asking me because you desperately-cling onto your failed point? (that "perspective" is adequately-defined by a common dictionary)


nameless;71780 wrote:
Perhaps you'll write your own dictionarey some day..

What does that have to with this thread and my conversations in it?

Pay attention, nameless, and stick to the points. Are you capable of an adult conversation???

:perplexed:


nameless;71780 wrote:
Then we can read it and we can have an intelligent conversation.

I do not need to write a dictionary to see that other people, in this thread, seem to agree with me that "perspectives" are just "opinions" and nothing more. It is just fancy philosophical rhetoric designed to cover-up simple motives. A "perspective" sounds really-smart and everything, but, at the bottom, it is just an 'opinion' and nothing more. There is nothing complex about this.


nameless;71780 wrote:
Until then, you are alone in your sandbox.

Is this yet another *PERSONAL INSULT*???

I apologize if I hurt your precious feelings somewhere in this thread, nameless.

Do you accept my apology?? Smile



nameless;71780 wrote:
Your bloated ego aside,

*PERSONAL INSULT*

Ouch, can you have a conversation without slandering your opponent?

:poke-eye:


nameless;71780 wrote:
a dictionary is for 'education' for 'communication'. Thats what it is for.

Is that a fact...?

Or is a dictionary a linguistic tool used to memorize Common uses of language?

Should I look up the meaning of life in the dictionary???

Do simple dictionary explanations apply to Philosophy?

(You should take a Philosophy 101 course, nameless, it may help you.)


nameless;71780 wrote:
You use words like ever... jeez, what the hell am I wasting time with you. We cant even discuss 'perspective' because you are clueless as to the meaning (outside your own little sandbox!).

Sandbox again, huh? Is this your attempt at an insult???

Let me look it up in the dictionary...

But seriously, we can discuss 'perspectives' all day long. Tell me when to begin.

Should I reach for a dictionary in order to philosophize with you???



nameless;71780 wrote:
Perhaps they were as ignorant as you?

*SLANDER*

I am not ignorant, nameless, despite your insinuation otherwise.


nameless;71780 wrote:
I repeat for them to.


... don't think so.
nameless out

Goodbye, come back anytime! :surrender:

Laughing
 
 

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 12/30/2024 at 11:33:52