Can we improve society through improving the brain?

Get Email Updates Email this Topic Print this Page

richrf
 
Reply Thu 16 Jul, 2009 07:36 am
@odenskrigare,
odenskrigare;77582 wrote:
but alternative medicine is generally ineffectual and does kill people:

What's the harm in alternative medicine?


You are kidding of course. Do you know how many millions of people have died of cancer after going through allopathatic treatments? Should we count these in your statistics??? Do you want me to solicit comments from all of these who went through chemotherapy and still died of cancer? You have to be kidding me, aren't you? Millions! Not just 12 or so.

Yes, people die of cancer, because the illness had gone way to far. Proper treatment early on including proper rest, diet and exercise, is the most effective way to prevent cancer. This is where I am at.

Quote:
Maybe those women think having bigger, more rigid boobs is worth the risk of brain tumors. (Many, perhaps most women who get implants probably don't have much going on up there anyway.)


Maybe. And maybe the physician who took the oath just temporarily forgot about doing no harm?

Rich
 
Solace
 
Reply Thu 16 Jul, 2009 08:05 am
@odenskrigare,
odenskrigare;77510 wrote:
On what basis do you say my vision of the future has no chance of becoming reality?

I mean are you actually keeping up with current research and implementations, or are you just going on what you feel is true?

I'm gonna go with door #2


Okay oden, I have to ask this, have you had brain modification surgery performed on you yet? I mean, you're an avid supporter of this stuff, so I assume you were/would be first in line to get it done. Or is this stuff still in the experimental stages yet? Experimental, as in it might never be considered safe and viable for such surgeries to be performed on a normal human brain.

First thing's first, you and whatever other advocates of brain modification there are lurking out there are going to have to convince the rest of us that there is something wrong with our brains. Moreover, you're going to have to convince us that you can fix it. And you're going to have to overcome one glaring flaw in your plot to create a superhuman, or posthuman, race. That is, if all of our brains are flawed, how can we put our trust in a science that was devised by a flawed brain!?

Or will some posthuman who has already had this surgery performed on them invent a time machine and come back in time to perform the first brain modification surgery on a normal brain so that it doesn't get screwed by a flawed human surgeon? Unless you're going to sell me something like that, I'm just going to continue to file this under "never gonna happen".

But hey, when the hordes of posthuman mutants come pounding on my door to drag me into the street and devour my flawed brain you can always say, "I told ya so". Goes good with a nice merlot.
 
Caroline
 
Reply Thu 16 Jul, 2009 11:14 am
@odenskrigare,
I wouldn't want my brain touched or improved in anyway, there's nothing wrong with it as it is.
 
richrf
 
Reply Thu 16 Jul, 2009 11:17 am
@Caroline,
I also want you to stay away from my brain. Thank you.

Feel free to do whatever you might want with your brain. If I may be so bold to suggest, that brain probe stuff sounds really hot.

Rich
 
manored
 
Reply Thu 16 Jul, 2009 11:49 am
@salima,
salima;77588 wrote:
you wouldnt be able to see them, but i assure you everyone around you and anyone who has heard you speak will come to the same conclusion.
I havent.

richrf;77636 wrote:


Maybe. And maybe the physician who took the oath just temporarily forgot about doing no harm?

Rich
That oath cannot actually be accomplished, I dont know any medical intervention that doesnt causes some harm, even if it does more good than harm. And, if the person thinks losing health in name of beauty is more good than harm, I suppose its not the doctor who is to judge it.

Solace;77645 wrote:

That is, if all of our brains are flawed, how can we put our trust in a science that was devised by a flawed brain!?
If no brains are flawed, thats an impossible situation because nothing is perfect.
If brains are flawed, well, thats why adventurers exist! =)

Really, Im sure there will be people willing to take the risk, just like there were people willing to go around the world by sea in a time where most believed that was an impossible and suicidal feat.

Caroline;77675 wrote:
I wouldn't want my brain touched or improved in anyway, there's nothing wrong with it as it is.
It has a limited lifespawn. Is that a problem? Depends of how much you wanna live =)
 
odenskrigare
 
Reply Thu 16 Jul, 2009 12:21 pm
@manored,
Caroline;77618 wrote:
I didn't day "this was meant to happen" nor did I say "it's for the best", infact I couldn't disagree more, i wouldn't wish a tragedy on anybody not even my worse enemy. I think im more on the lines off alleviating the tragedy as it's not very nice to say to someone who's just been raped for instance, "it was for the best", or "it was meant to happen".


Ok would you tell a rape victim "try to find the good in your situation"?

William;77620 wrote:
"Pyrrhus inherited the throne of Epirus in Northern Greece around 306 B.C., and as a young man proved himself on the battlefield again and again. Pyrrhus apparently had great strategic skills, but he also had the reputation of not knowing when to stop. In 281 he went to Italy and defeated the Romans at Heraclea and Asculum, but suffered bitterly heavy losses. The devastation led to his famous statement, "One more such victory and I am lost" -- hence the term "Pyrrhic victory" for any victory so costly as to be ruinous".


How is this tidbit even relevant

Fido;77628 wrote:
You should try to remember that Wish was also a Norse, Germanic god; and that most of us still live in his world or in the land of fate, and its fairies


Errrr fairies don't exist

richrf;77636 wrote:
You are kidding of course. Do you know how many millions of people have died of cancer after going through allopathatic treatments? Should we count these in your statistics??? Do you want me to solicit comments from all of these who went through chemotherapy and still died of cancer? You have to be kidding me, aren't you? Millions! Not just 12 or so.


I didn't say Western medicine is perfect, that it has a 100% success rate

What I will say is that, if cancer is spreading, chemotherapy and surgery are sounder bets than sticking needles in a person and chanting "Aum namah Shivaya"

richrf;77636 wrote:
Yes, people die of cancer, because the illness had gone way to far. Proper treatment early on including proper rest, diet and exercise, is the most effective way to prevent cancer.


Yeah and no doctor would disagree with you.

richrf;77636 wrote:
Maybe. And maybe the physician who took the oath just temporarily forgot about doing no harm?


The harm is subjective here.

Solace;77645 wrote:
Okay oden, I have to ask this, have you had brain modification surgery performed on you yet? I mean, you're an avid supporter of this stuff, so I assume you were/would be first in line to get it done. Or is this stuff still in the experimental stages yet? Experimental, as in it might never be considered safe and viable for such surgeries to be performed on a normal human brain.


Experimental as in "it's experimental now but man I wonder how many groundbreaking surgical procedures just rot in the lab forever"

Solace;77645 wrote:
First thing's first, you and whatever other advocates of brain modification there are lurking out there are going to have to convince the rest of us that there is something wrong with our brains. Moreover, you're going to have to convince us that you can fix it.


Sure when you guys are surrounded by people with godlike cognition who are living at least twice as long as you, you might come around.

Solace;77645 wrote:
And you're going to have to overcome one glaring flaw in your plot to create a superhuman, or posthuman, race. That is, if all of our brains are flawed, how can we put our trust in a science that was devised by a flawed brain!?


Everything's flawed. Existing cyborgs (like the one you saw earlier ITT; hello they are real) are flawed. Posthumans will be flawed. They'll just be less flawed.

Solace;77645 wrote:
Or will some posthuman who has already had this surgery performed on them invent a time machine and come back in time to perform the first brain modification surgery on a normal brain so that it doesn't get screwed by a flawed human surgeon? Unless you're going to sell me something like that, I'm just going to continue to file this under "never gonna happen".


You can do that but you're going to have to throw out everything that was improved on incrementally: agriculture, clothing, tools ...

I'm pretty sure the Internet didn't start out the way it is now either. It wasn't perfect. It will never be perfect. Just like humans and posthumans will never be perfect. The Internet as it stands now is just better than it was in the 70's. But apparently that's not good enough for you, so maybe you should just unplug your computer...

Caroline;77675 wrote:
I wouldn't want my brain touched or improved in anyway, there's nothing wrong with it as it is.


I hate to say this but that's awfully vain.

richrf;77678 wrote:
I also want you to stay away from my brain.


Vain.

richrf;77678 wrote:
Feel free to do whatever you might want with your brain. If I may be so bold to suggest, that brain probe stuff sounds really hot.


You appear to be under the mistaken impression that this stuff is a joke.

(It isn't.)
 
richrf
 
Reply Thu 16 Jul, 2009 01:14 pm
@manored,
manored;77682 wrote:
That oath cannot actually be accomplished, I dont know any medical intervention that doesnt causes some harm, even if it does more good than harm. And, if the person thinks losing health in name of beauty is more good than harm, I suppose its not the doctor who is to judge it.


Well then, I guess they should drop it from the oath instead of pretending they (physicians) will do something that they will not do.

On the other hand, I have been able to keep myself plenty healthy for 28 years without using any drugs, without going to any physician, without going through an assembly line of medical tests, and by simply using fresh foods, relaxation, stretching, and breathin exercises, self-massage, and maybe some simple food or mineral based herbs now and then, .. etc. to prevent health problems or to bring myself back to health when some minor problem occurs. So it is possible, but it requires time and knowledge - neither of which enhances profits.

BTW, the same goes for my son and my ex, so it is not a matter of luck.

I agree with you though, the moment you reach for the knife or intervene with powerful drugs to suppress symptoms, you are harming the body. And, unfortunately, it is downhill from there. People are walking around nowadays with bags of pills, and the concept of a healthy body is almost lost. Even in relatively young people.

Rich
 
odenskrigare
 
Reply Thu 16 Jul, 2009 01:22 pm
@odenskrigare,
anecdotal (testimonial) evidence - The Skeptic's Dictionary - Skepdic.com
 
Zetetic11235
 
Reply Thu 16 Jul, 2009 02:10 pm
@Solace,
Quite a few technophobes crawling out of the wood works. The way I see it, you won't need to be convinced. Your kids will grow up with a very different mindset; eventually there will be too few detractors. That is simply the ebb and flow of public sentiment towards things the general public has a limited understanding of. Before the atomic bomb, the public was science crazy, and now that those who witnessed the cold war at its height are becoming old, and those who have no recollection of the Cold War are replacing them, the public sentiment is shifting. This is not necessarily a good thing.

Ideally, everyone (not just specialists) would be able to differentiate between promising technology and hazardous technology, but this seems impossible as things are now.

Oden is simply bringing to light things that are incrementally being proposed and accepted and used. Neuron-machine interfaces have existed for several years :

Rat Neurons In A Dish Now Playing Flight Simulator: Science Fiction in the News

Rat Brain Robot Uses Cultured Rat Neurons: Science Fiction in the News

Monkey thinks robotic arm into action - LiveScience- msnbc.com

As have implants for deafness and blindness:

The Bionic Eye | Popular Science

YouTube - Bionic Eye

Cochlear implant - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

As prospects for correcting things such as mental retardation or severe autism grow, and the possibility of enhancement for the average person comes to light, people will desire said enhancements. Who wouldn't want to be able to see with unlimited clarity, live fifty years longer, have photographic memory, ect? These developments are not that far off, and they will catch on like wildfire if they are made viable for a large consumer base.



Solace;77645 wrote:

First thing's first, you and whatever other advocates of brain modification there are lurking out there are going to have to convince the rest of us that there is something wrong with our brains. Moreover, you're going to have to convince us that you can fix it. And you're going to have to overcome one glaring flaw in your plot to create a superhuman, or posthuman, race. That is, if all of our brains are flawed, how can we put our trust in a science that was devised by a flawed brain!?


Lol. We do that everyday. Maybe you should stop driving your car.

I think you are cramming subtle issues together into one and coming to absurd conclusions. Repairing what is broken is very distinct from making better what is obsolete. The first step would be to help people who are quadriplegic, blind or deaf. As these technologies develop, we would be gaining insight into the human brain. We will see more clearly how to manipulate it for gain.

The brain is not totally flawed per se, it is suboptimal. Some parts are working well but could work better, some seem superfluous. The brain is not one single solid mass, it has many parts that accomplish various tasks; some of which are not totally suited to modern man, but more to primative man. Some people are vastly more intelligent than others, and some of those people are vastly less intelligent than a small handful like William Sidis or Kim Ung-Yong. At the very least we could strive to make every human a peak human.
 
Solace
 
Reply Thu 16 Jul, 2009 02:22 pm
@odenskrigare,
odenskrigare;77690 wrote:
Experimental as in "it's experimental now but man I wonder how many groundbreaking surgical procedures just rot in the lab forever"


I wouldn't know. But I daresay we'd be both surprised and disappointed. Inovation sometimes gets overlooked. But this is beside the point. The point is, will the government allow people to perform surgeries on normal, healthy human brains?

odenskrigare;77690 wrote:
Sure when you guys are surrounded by people with godlike cognition who are living at least twice as long as you, you might come around.


Could the agnostic please explain what he means by "godlike cognition"? :rolleyes: But don't worry, I don't envy others their bigger brains, nor do I lose any sleep at the thought that someday I'm gonna die. So no, I probably won't "come around". I'll be content to let you superhumans whipe me out, because that's something that is so much better than what we mere humans would ever do to those who disgust us. :sarcastic: Yes, superior race indeed Adolf.

odenskrigare;77690 wrote:
I'm pretty sure the Internet didn't start out the way it is now either. It wasn't perfect. It will never be perfect. Just like humans and posthumans will never be perfect. The Internet as it stands now is just better than it was in the 70's. But apparently that's not good enough for you, so maybe you should just unplug your computer...


I should unplug my computer because I don't want to have brain surgery? Well, that doesn't make much sense to me. But since unplugging my computer would mean that I wouldn't come back to this thread which is just about silly enough to give me a headache that might lead to a brain tumor which might force me to need brain surgery, then maybe it makes sense after all.:whistling:

odenskrigare;77690 wrote:
I hate to say this but that's awfully vain.


Being content that my brain is fine the way it is is vain? So wanting to improve my brain must not be vain. By that logic, being content that I look good enough as I am must be vain, and getting plastic surgery so that I look better isn't vain. You have a curious notion of vanity.

odenskrigare;77690 wrote:
You appear to be under the mistaken impression that this stuff is a joke.

(It isn't.)


You appear to be under the mistaken impression that the human brain is a joke.

(It isn't.)
 
odenskrigare
 
Reply Thu 16 Jul, 2009 02:32 pm
@Solace,
Solace;77723 wrote:
I wouldn't know. But I daresay we'd be both surprised and disappointed. Inovation sometimes gets overlooked. But this is beside the point. The point is, will the government allow people to perform surgeries on normal, healthy human brains?


Well, they, that is the US government, are allowing it now.

Did you not read Zetetic's last post?

Which government btw?

Solace;77723 wrote:
Could the agnostic please explain what he means by "godlike cognition"? :rolleyes:


Literal and figurative language - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Solace;77723 wrote:
But don't worry, I don't envy others their bigger brains, nor do I lose any sleep at the thought that someday I'm gonna die.


Okay

Solace;77723 wrote:
So no, I probably won't "come around". I'll be content to let you superhumans whipe me out, because that's something that is so much better than what we mere humans would ever do to those who disgust us. :sarcastic: Yes, superior race indeed Adolf.


Actually, I think if armed conflict broke out between humans and posthumans, it would most likely be the human camp who fired the first shot.

They just wouldn't fire the last.

Solace;77723 wrote:
I should unplug my computer because I don't want to have brain surgery?


No, because you don't accept flawed science and technology from flawed brains.

Solace;77723 wrote:
Being content that my brain is fine the way it is is vain? So wanting to improve my brain must not be vain.


In case you haven't noticed, we have a lot of really dumb heuristics built in, and even very smart people fall prey to them.

Solace;77723 wrote:
You appear to be under the mistaken impression that the human brain is a joke.

(It isn't.)


As an aspiring neuroscientist, I can tell you the brain is pretty awesome in a lot of respects, but it too can be improved upon.
 
Solace
 
Reply Thu 16 Jul, 2009 02:40 pm
@Zetetic11235,
Zetetic11235;77722 wrote:
Quite a few technophobes crawling out of the wood works.


So because I don't want my brain tampered with I'm afraid of technology? The OP made allusions to using this technology to make it so that people no longer commit evil acts. Let's cut through the bs, we're not talking about simply curing genetic defects or enhancing lifespans, we're talking about behaviour modification here. You might trust someone enough to allow them to determine how you behave, but I sure don't. My problem isn't that I'm afraid of technology; my problem is that I'm afraid of those people who would use technology to turn me into their idea of a more perfect human.
 
odenskrigare
 
Reply Thu 16 Jul, 2009 02:47 pm
@Solace,
Solace;77727 wrote:
So because I don't want my brain tampered with I'm afraid of technology? The OP made allusions to using this technology to make it so that people no longer commit evil acts. Let's cut through the bs, we're not talking about simply curing genetic defects or enhancing lifespans, we're talking about behaviour modification here. You might trust someone enough to allow them to determine how you behave, but I sure don't. My problem isn't that I'm afraid of technology; my problem is that I'm afraid of those people who would use technology to turn me into their idea of a more perfect human.


I have repeatedly insisted that people who undergo neural modification should opt into it.

Granted society might eventually "force" you into it, in the same sense that people are essentially forced to have mailing addresses and telephones and depend on agriculture nowadays, but that's nothing I can prevent.
 
Solace
 
Reply Thu 16 Jul, 2009 02:55 pm
@odenskrigare,
odenskrigare;77726 wrote:
Well, they, that is the US government, are allowing it now.

Did you not read Zetetic's last post?

Which government btw?


Actually I hadn't read Zetetic's post before I posted the one you're referring to. He posted before that post, but after I began it. So I was being hopelessly optimistic that someone in the government would have enough sense to say, "Might elective brain surgery be an unnecessary health risk?"

odenskrigare;77726 wrote:
Actually, I think if armed conflict broke out between humans and posthumans, it would most likely be the human camp who fired the first shot.

They just wouldn't fire the last.


Wait, didn't you say that they might just wipe us out in disgust? Didn't you, multiple times, warn that not getting on the boat of brain modification might mean war? Don't throw this back on us humans. We never even so much as mentioned the idea of killing posthumans. It was entirely your idea and you know it.

BTW, when you get your brain modified, you might want to tell the surgeon to leave alone that part of the brain that allows for aggression and all those nasty things that you wanted to rid humanity of in the OP. You might just need those sort of functions if you're going to try to wipe us out.
 
odenskrigare
 
Reply Thu 16 Jul, 2009 03:03 pm
@Solace,
Solace;77731 wrote:
Actually I hadn't read Zetetic's post before I posted the one you're referring to. He posted before that post, but after I began it. So I was being hopelessly optimistic that someone in the government would have enough sense to say, "Might elective brain surgery be an unnecessary health risk?"


Guess not

(protip: maybe curing blindness isn't such a bad idea)

Solace;77731 wrote:
Wait, didn't you say that they might just wipe us out in disgust? Didn't you, multiple times, warn that not getting on the boat of brain modification might mean war? Don't throw this back on us humans. We never even so much as mentioned the idea of killing posthumans. It was entirely your idea and you know it.


Well I mean it's a possible scenario, not one I'm advocating

Let the record show that the only people advocating violence thus far are radical green anarchists.

Solace;77731 wrote:
BTW, when you get your brain modified, you might want to tell the surgeon to leave alone that part of the brain that allows for aggression and all those nasty things that you wanted to rid humanity of in the OP.


I think some kernel of aggression will have to be preserved, but, overall, the will to aggression could be diminished substantially.
 
Caroline
 
Reply Thu 16 Jul, 2009 03:33 pm
@odenskrigare,
odenskrigare;77690 wrote:
Ok would you tell a rape victim "try to find the good in your situation"?

No..................................
 
odenskrigare
 
Reply Thu 16 Jul, 2009 03:36 pm
@Caroline,
Caroline;77734 wrote:
No..................................


Yes, of course not
 
Caroline
 
Reply Thu 16 Jul, 2009 03:41 pm
@odenskrigare,
What do you mean? What is your point?
Thanks.

---------- Post added 07-16-2009 at 04:49 PM ----------

odenskrigare;77726 wrote:

As an aspiring neuroscientist, I can tell you the brain is pretty awesome in a lot of respects, but it too can be improved upon.

It would help if the scientists new more about the brain first before they start improving on it, there isn't enough knowledge about the brain before you start tampering with it. There is no way I would let you near mine.
 
odenskrigare
 
Reply Thu 16 Jul, 2009 03:55 pm
@Caroline,
Caroline;77736 wrote:
What do you mean? What is your point?
Thanks.


Trying to find the good in everything is silly

But since that's way off topic, I'd like to return to it

Since we've already established firmly that neural modifications are not comic book fantasies, how about their use? Where are we going with them?
 
William
 
Reply Thu 16 Jul, 2009 03:56 pm
@odenskrigare,
Originally Posted by William http://www.philosophyforum.com/forum/images/PHBlue/buttons/viewpost.gif

"Pyrrhus inherited the throne of Epirus in Northern Greece around 306 B.C., and as a young man proved himself on the battlefield again and again. Pyrrhus apparently had great strategic skills, but he also had the reputation of not knowing when to stop. In 281 he went to Italy and defeated the Romans at Heraclea and Asculum, but suffered bitterly heavy losses. The devastation led to his famous statement, "One more such victory and I am lost" -- hence the term "Pyrrhic victory" for any victory so costly as to be ruinous".

How is this tidbit even relevant?

Nice try Oden. If you don't mind attach it to the rest of the post. Your selective and rather immature parsing of others' posts is a bit juvenile, at best. If you are going to "quote" me, do not take what I say out of context or refrain from from quoting me at all.

Thank you,
William
 
 

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 12/21/2024 at 07:58:38