http://www.atpark.net :: A community site for Family children. I've not yet seen this linked to on any other Family-related websites. (Note: It requires a password to access most sections.)

Another Family community site can be found at http://www.netlinkup.com/mem_only.html

http://www.nospank.net/kent.htm


-----
Best. Ascii art. Ever.
http://www.textfiles.com/100/angela.art

On Claire Borowik:

http://www.xfamily.org/index.php/Susan_Claire_Borowik
http://www.newdaynews.com/openhouse/index.cgi/noframes/read/10231
http://www.frouman.net/kidnapping
http://www.frouman.net/notnormal
http://www.lamatteryresource.org/Letters/borowick/04212005

The Family's "Boards" website:

https://famboard.com (password protected to keep outsiders out)

Hmmm... the art seems to be incomplete. Here's a link to the full image:

http://www.chris.com/ascii/art/html/nakedladies.html

Argentina court records
Argentine court records related to Claire Borowik (and others)
This is very incomplete. There are a lot more records (thousands of pages) but most are not available on line. Some additional records may be found through http://www.pjn.gov.ar

http://www.frouman.net/files/causa81-89-mansur-prack-12131993.pdf
San Martin Court of Appeals, Case 81/89 "Cavazza, Juan C. and others, on Inf. Art.125, 139, 140, 142, Par.l, 142 bis, 210, 293 of the Code of Proceedings and art.3 of Law 23,592," Federal Court of San Isidro, 1 Sec.2 Office II, Reg. 443. Federal Judges: Horacio Enrique Prack, Alberto Mansur, Daniel Mario Rudi (dissented), Buenos Aires, Argentina, December 13, 1993. 127 page PDF file. In Spanish.

http://www.frouman.net/cavazza-sc-june291995.pdf
C. 489. XXVII. Recurso de Hecho. Cavazza, Juan Carlos y otros s/ infraccion articulos 125, 139, 140, 142, inc. 1, 142 bis, 210, 239 del Codigo Penal y art. 3 ley 23.592, Causa No. 583. Argentina Supreme Court. June 29, 1995. 2 page (but the 2nd page is blank) PDF file. In Spanish.

http://www.frouman.net/cavazza-sccomp-91-lxxxii.pdf
Cavazza, Juan Carlos y Otros S/ Infr. Arts 125 y Otros, S.C. Comp. 91 L.XXXII. Argentina Supreme Court. July 19, 1996 and October 10, 1996. 3 page PDF file. In Spanish.

- http://www.geocities.com/tedriii/classic_tan.html?20059 - By Ted Rudow III
- http://www.geocities.com/godsvoices7/Hopenus.html
- http://www.kidzvids.com/nathan.htm - he's got some music up

Password-protected Family site used by ABM offices: https://abmc.net

http://www.wordstockrocks.com

(Interesting picture: http://www.wordstockrocks.com/content/index.php/news/73? )

http://www.roadstock.org

A couple Family homes:

- http://www.sunshin.org
- http://www.outlookbrazil.com

Edit (Moderator): This post has been moved to a restricted forum, in accordance with the author's wishes

you can take my blog off the list
You guys can be such morons. I'm not in the fucking family and haven't been for quite a few years, take lookbackinanger.com off the list please.

oh and take loxy off the list too
come on guys, get a clue before you label a site as belonging to family members. loxyfady.com should be off the list too

Maybe a little REAL research is in order?

gcom,

Did you read Mel's disclaimer? All you needed to do was politely ask us to remove your site from the list (as I have just done).

I don't really feel the need to be polite when he didn't even research before including and the disclaimer was far from sufficient. I don't have to like you guys and be nice to you, i just have to come here and tell you to get me off your stupid lists when you fuck up ... which always seems to be the case when it involves something to do with me

gcom, I've edited my post to remove the sites you requested from the list. They were linked to very extensively by other Family members' blogs, and I didn't claim the links were research.

By the way, the urls were not meant to "out" anyone. This may not matter to you since you're not in the Family, but if anything I think it's positive for Family members for other people to see the blogs, as it helps to show things like diverse interests, fairly normal youth thinking, etc.

I think you'll understand that as a non-family member I fundamentally disagree with the Family's belief structure and lack of transparency. Mid-identifying my blog as a likely Family blog is something I take quite seriously. I doubt any of the actual family members on that list actually care whether they were listed. But the ones who aren't *will* care. This is the age of google.

http://www.livinginaworld.blogspot.com/ - Kristina

....is also not in The Family.

What bothers me the most is that it was assumed that those were "Family" just because they were linked to by a Family blog. It is pretty plain to tell after a quick review of the each profile or after skimming a few posts who is Family and who isn't.

Okay, Guest, I've removed the link you mentioned, and since this has apparently been a bigger issue to some people than I expected I've updated my intro as follows:

http://adriannesramblings.blogspot.com/ - Audrey Rudow
is also not in the Family
Remove it please