Wed 14 Nov, 2007 02:08 pm - [SIZE=50]molok69, I would like to say thanks again for your interest in this tread. [/SIZE]
[quote=PoPpAScience][SIZE=50]That last post I had a hard time writing because it is not what I was... (view)
Mon 12 Nov, 2007 03:14 pm - [quote=Pythagorean][B]Fido, kennethamy,[/B]
An essential property of the physical world would be a necessary proposition. Those who believe in the reality of essential properties are implicitly... (view)
Mon 12 Nov, 2007 02:41 pm - [quote=molok69]So if I say:
`Potential` triggered by "`pure coincidence`s premises met", allows `pure coincidence` itself to occur, obviously it did, and together with `potential`,... (view)
Mon 12 Nov, 2007 01:38 am - [quote=molok69]Yes, that was what I imagined the paradox to be!
But I need help!
I`m experiencing some language issues with `pure coincidence`, particularly Norwegians pointing out that... (view)
Sun 11 Nov, 2007 12:27 am - [quote=molok69]What is the paradox of `potential`?[/quote]
[SIZE=50]The paradox of "Potential", is its duel nature. It is a non-something that acts like a something. It is the driving... (view)