After studying most of the Religions and most of the Sciences.
The 'studies' must have been rather superficial if, as you say, you merely spent about 30 years in study. What does 'most' mean? Do you know how many 'sciences' there are? How many 'religions'? Most? Do you rather mean that you had a 'taste' of 'most'...?
Is this supposed to be some sort of credentials?
After trying to visualize the very beginning of All, with the purest of logic.
With varying degrees of 'success' I'd imagine..
I have found that at a certain point, 'logic' is no longer a functional tool in the ascertainment of the true basic nature of existence, and must be abandoned to 'continue' past that point. Logic can't even get very deep into quantum theory!
After absorbing all I could from the age of 7 years old, till I was 41. I came up with this view 10 years ago. Now, this view is how I see things this day. I am open for a change of view, if more knowledge dictates it so.
As the experience of common perseptions tell us that the world is in a constant state of flux, of change, so to must a 'live' world-view. If you came upon a 'world view' 10 years ago, and still maintain that perspective, you are either dead, or have gotten intellectually mired in some 'belief infection'. If you have not grown, expanded, stretched your perspective in 10 years, you might check, you could be dead and petrified. Perhaps you 'deny' "more knowledge" in the support and maintanence of your pet theory (or 'belief infection')