Fri 25 Jul, 2008 12:28 am - I like this, butt Level 1 and 2 are somewhat the same question and the 3rd an assumption of something observing this? No, I don`t think it`s the holy trinity! Meta-humans I`d like to hear more about! (view)
Sun 27 Jan, 2008 02:00 pm - "Abso. intet" is a term I use in my thinking, and I wish to share it to get some feedback and ideas.
It is a dark, silent and cold `eternal moment` that existed before everything, and... (view)
Fri 16 Nov, 2007 04:19 pm - I find this part very good:
[B]'Potential' triggered by the premise of 'pure coincidence', sparks ignition of a 'self-creating existence.[/B]
But this you have to explain... (view)
Wed 14 Nov, 2007 03:44 am - Thanks!
But I don`t see how you can expand further into the past, as I see it `potential` `pure coincidence` are both within the first `moment`, and so is the `popping `of "aware". (view)
Sun 11 Nov, 2007 03:35 am - Yes, that was what I imagined the paradox to be!
But I need help!
I`m experiencing some language issues with `pure coincidence`, particularly Norwegians pointing out that `co-incidence` must... (view)
Sat 10 Nov, 2007 08:10 pm - That it actually makes sense to you, amazes me, as my "gibberish" thinking and ways of expressing them, rarely makes sense to anyone. Showing what I wrote to a average fellow Norwegian,... (view)
Sat 10 Nov, 2007 04:28 am - So if I say:
`Potential` triggered by "`pure coincidence`s premises met", allows `pure coincidence` itself to occur, obviously it did, and together with `potential`, `pure coincidence`... (view)
Fri 9 Nov, 2007 08:44 pm - But how does this "will" occure?, is it something within "aware" that somehow just had to be? There must be an explanaiton to this, for me to stop asking the questions, how? and... (view)
Fri 9 Nov, 2007 06:20 pm - Yes I see, but first back to "aware" in the "Paradox of P.." and this act of "will", where did this "come" from?
I`m asking because I find all of this very... (view)
