Innocence is always buried in us, if not already discovered. Wisdom/Science as the annihilation of throbbing errors?

The transcendental is the virgin eternal, as its program remains untouched, which is to evolve by synthesizing experience -- sin as a passing inferior synthesis, eventually re-synthesized as grace/wisdom?.

Consider the myth. Jesus is born of a virgin. Only the transcendental is virginal in man. The transcendental is read-only-memory. Personality is random-access-memory....? But when the computer is on (one) its ram and rom are one.(on)...? Is Jesus electrified ram-rom?

is ram the donut and rom the donut hole? is jesus prime (1 to the third plus i) just the self-consciousness of this rendezvous?

Little convoluted that post don't you think?

here's what it's about. the jesus myth combined with a digital electronic myth, and further combined with transcendental philosophy in the manner of kant and hegel (& zwidorff?).

i've developed a concept-system that seems cohesive at the moment. so i continue to integrate different metaphorical and mythological as evidence for the very transcendental I'm describing. I think there is a non-myth at the heart of all our myths. something like an archetype that urges us to think, and by thinking make experience cohere in a way that seems more beautiful or pleasurable.

Assuming such a theory were true, my description of it would be the self-consciousness of the digital-spirit-reality(monism/nonism) it describes, ....and a description of this self-consciousness.

If Jesus is just a myth, then billions of people have been led up the garden path. Heck he got a lot of media for a guy that never existed

I wouldn't want to reduce him to that. He functions in many ways in many systems. Experienced as history, the gospel is history. Experienced as myth, the gospel is myth. In any case, the myth is great. Also the king james translation is great.

Thing is, in my view, we are going to pick someone or another for our myth. Some moral-spiritual ideal personified. Jesus or Elvis or Einstein or Celebs or Athletes, etc.

How can you equate the most remarkable the most influential person that ever walked the earth with Elvis, Celebrities and athletes? :perplexed:

Innocence is always buried in us, if not already discovered. Wisdom/Science as the annihilation of throbbing errors?

The transcendental is the virgin eternal, as its program remains untouched, which is to evolve by synthesizing experience -- sin as a passing inferior synthesis, eventually re-synthesized as grace/wisdom?.

Consider the myth. Jesus is born of a virgin. Only the transcendental is virginal in man. The transcendental is read-only-memory. Personality is random-access-memory....? But when the computer is on (one) its ram and rom are one.(on)...? Is Jesus electrified ram-rom?

is ram the donut and rom the donut hole? is jesus prime (1 to the third plus i) just the self-consciousness of this rendezvous?

You certainly cleared that up for me.

Did he/she really really?

You certainly cleared that up for me.

The Transcendental Logic is that part of the Critique where Kant investigates the understanding and its role in constituting our knowledge. The understanding is defined as the faculty of the mind which deals with concepts (A51-52/B75-76).

Because data stored in ROM cannot be modified (at least not very quickly or easily), it is mainly used to distribute firmware (software that is very closely tied to specific hardware, and unlikely to require frequent updates)

The Gospel of John identifies the Logos, through which all things are made, as divine (theos),[4] and further identifies Jesus as the incarnation of the Logos.

i've developed a concept-system that seems cohesive at the moment. so i continue to integrate different metaphorical and mythological as evidence for the very transcendental I'm describing. I think there is a non-myth at the heart of all our myths.

Despite Joyce's revolutionary techniques, the author repeatedly emphasized that the book was neither random nor meaningless; with Ellmann quoting the author as having stated: "I can justify every line of my book."[93] To Sisley Huddleston he stated "critics who were most appreciative of Ulysses are complaining about my new work. They cannot understand it. Therefore they say it is meaningless. Now if it were meaningless it could be written quickly without thought, without pains, without erudition; but I assure you that these 20 pages now before us [i.e. chapter I.8] cost me twelve hundred hours and an enormous expense of spirit." [94] When the editor of Vanity Fair asked Joyce if the sketches in Work in Progress were consecutive and interrelated, Joyce replied "It is all consecutive and interrelated."[95]

Beauty is a value derived from the senses and perception. A truth is a logical and parsimonious consistency with evidence and other truths. There is no evidence or anything that would imply that beauty is anything more than a subjective notion that is based on the sensual and perceptual pleasure of a conscious observer.

Reason speaks to the truth of human objective experience.

Beauty speaks to the truth of human subjective experience.
Reason speaks to the truth of human objective experience.
Beauty is the splendor of truth, directly experienced intuitively.
Objective analysis does not improve on the experience of the beautiful.

You only have that theory because you have never been nailed to a matress by some one like I used to be...No one I ever looked twice at was ever innocent again...On the bright side, it didn't kill them, but that was only luck...

Innocence is always buried in us, if not already discovered. Wisdom/Science as the annihilation of throbbing errors?

The transcendental is the virgin eternal, as its program remains untouched, which is to evolve by synthesizing experience -- sin as a passing inferior synthesis, eventually re-synthesized as grace/wisdom?.

Consider the myth. Jesus is born of a virgin. Only the transcendental is virginal in man. The transcendental is read-only-memory. Personality is random-access-memory....? But when the computer is on (one) its ram and rom are one.(on)...? Is Jesus electrified ram-rom?

is ram the donut and rom the donut hole? is jesus prime (1 to the third plus i) just the self-consciousness of this rendezvous?

So death is the true end of innocence.
The only end to innocence is death.
And yet some might say the only true innocence is death, because death is the only true thing there is.
Innocence is the only thing there is?

---------- Post added 03-09-2010 at 11:50 PM ----------


I believe I am still a virgin even though i have had sex.
Does virginity have anything to do with sex?
Or is it just the correct kind of sex?
Can sex be correct? if you dont lose something and if you dont gain something else?

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder