Yes, I'm in America. What I mean with that is that some of the discussions on the forum say there are Fundamentalists Christians and then there are ... other Christians. However, the general overtone that I've seen everywhere I look the fundi.

Above all, it just seems like the conversation in the original thread amongst Christians is not the idea Jesus portrayed... and Jesus is claimed to be the heart of Christianity. So is this a rational way of looking at it?

The advantage is, back to the original post, the advantage being the creation of the circumstances that bring us closer to fulfilling the prophesies of Revelation. This is much of the conversation here in America among Christians and has been for several hundred years.

It's not the oil or the money or anything else that brought us into Iraq, it's the mentality of the Americans and the distribution of fear that has brought us into Iraq. Christianity is at the very heart and core of this mentality. If it weren't for the beliefs of these radical Christians and their division among men, we would not be in Iraq.

So my point is, Christians talk about the persecution and have brought about the circumstances surrounding their persecution. Their gain is actually their loss but they are too blind to see this. Their hopefulness of the second coming of Christ cannot happens until there's persecution in the world. So inadvertently, they've given these fears a voice, thus creating the havoc we are facing today.

Now we are at the point where many Christians feel they are to be separated from the rest of the world because their religious beliefs, no matter how far spread, are the law and they are willing to enforce the law of their God with force and might. Thus, there will be death, war and evil doings by mankind. A devout Christian will fight to his death protecting his beliefs just as an Iraqi would.

So question would be, to any Christian... What would Jesus have done?

Christians in my neck of the woods are praying for the second coming of Christ. In order for the prophecy to be fulfilled, Christians would have to be enslaved, murdered, persecuted and then hung to a cross. They look forward to it and live their lives for it... Instead of actually taking into consideration the way and life of Jesus Christ.

OH, BTW, it was not George Bush's advisor's that decided he should go into Iraq. The invasion of Iraq was planned long before George Bush jr. was made president.

Justin,
It is admiral to see your wisdom endeavor t0 fight against the mind of the entrenched fundamental Christian who has been indoctrinated to "look forward" to the end of mankind. Because history is pretty much hearsay, knowing the truth behind such writings is impossible to know. In all honesty, no one truly knows, but it is understandable why that doctrine has held fast all these years as we witness the state of the world and the gross, and inept way we are running it.
I myself have tried to break through in another forum such as the "Jesus" one we have discussed, with no avail. How so very sad to have a multitude of people anticipating the "end of the world". Talk about a horrendous "self-fulfilling prophesy. Not directly, but indirectly, to me, it is a slap in the face of God to render one of his creation's (the Earth) with such indifference. To bury one's head in the sand and "await", to me, is as much of an offense as those who are self made stewards who relish their own egotistical deity who think they know how to be God as they recognize no authority higher than themselves. All we have to do is take a look around to see how that is turning out. See list. Ha. I know, it not very funny. Not at all.
As interpretations go, today I had one of my little epiphanies in that death itself could be the "end of the world" as it would be for any individual. When we are reborn for those "victims or those compatible" with that continuum, they return "after" what is to become, is over. Such as a hell on Earth.
It is truly sad the indifference of those fundamental "Christian's" that have such a disdain for this island Earth we call home. Of course in all honesty, I don't think it is the Christian themselves, but those who are empowered who stand behind the pulpits. Power is corrupting no matter what strata it exists in. Even religion. Every day is a new day and I have no idea of what tomorrow brings. I can only hope one day those magic words will come to mind that will help those among us who are so perplexed, develop a better understanding of God. I don't know, my friend, if this helped or hindered the frustration you are encountering or not. I just wanted to share it with you and others who might want to know.
William

There are milions of Americans who want israel to start a vast war with it's neigbours so the events of revelation can be played out. They are activlly trying to promote this.:eek::eek::eek:

The fundamentalists that you see, "everywhere [you] look", are there, because you have not stepped outside your box to look at the whole of Christianity. There are billions of Christians around the world, most of whom are not American fundamentalist protestants.

There have been a lot of generalizations here; it is a mistake to look at one random facebook conversation between "christians", and to look at the only Christians you have known in your personal life (apparently fundamentalist protestants), and to then come up with this conclusion about a Christian mentality of fear. I just don't see it with the Christians I know, and I don't see it in the teachings of the new testament, or in most Christian writings...it doesn't exist throughout most of the Christian world.

It seems that there is an obvious mentality of fear within the atheist/agnostic group...I will call it "religophobia": fear of religion!

And yes, I know this to be true, because I have read many a forum post by atheist/agnostic types that talk about "scary" religious people, and have heard this mentioned a few times in my social circles by those all-fearing atheist/agnostics! :rolleyes:

While you do make a good point, I've never seen a christian forum or a christian church that is anything but fundamental and judgmental. Where are these other Christians we're speaking of as I've sought out REAL Christians my entire life.

It's not one conversation we're discussing. This original article came from Christian News. This is considered distribution of fear no matter how you choose to slice it. The mentality of fear is present all over. I'd actually like to discover a Christian Church or a Christian community that actually followed the teachings of Christ instead of following each other.

It's not just Christians though, it's many faiths practice similar things. Distribution of fear is all over the place and much of it, the majority of it that I see comes from Christianity, probably because it's the largest religion.

It's actually not the fear of the atheist that is the topic. It's the fear within religion. We are simply discussing what's going on in the world and in religion and much of what is said is true about the Christian faith. I understand there are Christians all over the world and have also met many of them. EVERY Christian I have met longs for the days of persecution... that's all they talk about. This could be a bishop from Bolivia to a preacher in America and all their followers.

It's not religiphobia coming from the atheist group, it's a matter of reason and rationale. Needless to say, I don't consider myself an atheist. Matter of fact, because of my beliefs I'll go out on a limb and if I were to fit into any one religion, it would be Christianity. So, it's a Christian who is speaking of the fear spread amongst the Christian faith. This has nothing to do with Atheism or other.

There are 2 billion Christians in the world. Let's say that through your own personal experience of Christians via online forums and churches/people who you have personally interacted with, you might have had decent exposure to 1 million of them. Even with that incredibly liberal estimate, you will have personally interacted with 5 hundredths of a percent (.0005) of the Christian population. This incredibly small percent will also be quite homogeneous within what we call "Christianity"; most of them are western/American Christians, who of course tend more to be fundamentalist protestants, compared to the whole of Christianity.

Now if you were going to perform a study and conclude that Christianity, as a whole, has a mentality of fear, would you rely upon data with such an obviously limited (and biased) sample? Of course not.

Along the same line of thinking, I could conclude that, based upon all of my experiences with people of dark skin color, they all seem to be: (insert racist stereotype here). Do you see the problem here?

I think there are many churches and christians who are like this. I have found some of them in America. And it appears to me that this thread will work well for "distributing fear" about religious people amongst this forum.

More generalizations here...maybe "much of what is said" at a KKK meeting could be true for a small group of black people. Does it hold that this should be applied to people of black skin color in general? You are judging people unilaterally when you really don't know them. Many people call themselves Christians; some are bad people, some are good people, and they all have their different interpretations of the faith. I have met a lot of fearful, nutty atheists and agnostics in my time. But it would be wrong for me to make such broad statements about all atheists and agnostics...that is prejudice.

And again, you refer to "every christian" you have met...see my first response for why this statement means nothing to me, nor should it to anyone else, in regards to the whole of Christian followers. Limited, biased sampling.

Calling yourself a Christian and at the same time condemning all Christians is not a great stance to have here. Prejudice is prejudice, no matter if it comes from inside or outside the group which is being judged unfairly.

And please, I'm not saying that ALL Christians are distributing fear, I'm saying that ALL the Christians I have encountered are. I'm not lumping all Christians into this, but again, we can see the fruit of Christianity all over the place. Problem is, some of it isn't fruit at all.

I said christians not red-neck cultists

The intention was to bring an example of fear being distributed among Christians and show how, in this example, they all just eat it up. The post was meant to discuss this.

If we wanted to open a discussion about Atheism distributing fear, then that would be a completely different discussion and I wouldn't get involved in that because I'm not an atheist. If I were, I guess I'd be a Atheistic Christian... ? Does that make sense? The fact of the matter is I'd consider myself a Christian and even label myself a Christian if I actually felt comfortable with what the Christian Religion is doing. It may be different where you come from and it may be different all over the world. However, Christianity has made it's voice very clear and does offer generalization across the religion. In general, Christianity is... The fruit it bears.

Then why have you, and others, throughout this thread used the word "Christian" to refer to the American fundamentalist protestants you are supposedly talking about? This is the type of generalization/stereotyping that breeds ignorance and prejudice.

But nobody picked up on this...

Again, one article, and a few people on facebook really tells us nothing. The example is ill-conceived, and could only be used to falsely "distribute fear" itself about the "fearing Christians".

This discussion, with all of its generalizations about Christianity and Christians, is distributing fear about Christian followers. Neither atheism nor Christianity spread fear. People with agendas spread it, regardless of their religious or philosophical affiliation; just like the "christian" from the article did, and just like it seems that yourself and others are doing here in this thread.

Grouping, labeling, and generalizing is at the root of prejudice and intolerance. I think we should avoid it if we are interested in "the philosophy of religion".

Is it? If you take a few moments to investigate the chatter in the Christian communities, the one article reflects a general consensus among Christians.. doesn't it?... or does it? Based again on where I live and who I encounter and how I was raised, this is an example of what I've seen displayed in Christianity since childhood and beyond. Am I falsely doing anything other than discussing something that is real and is of real concern?

I disagree here to an extent. I agree that it's people that spread fear however, much of this fear is spread amongst people who call themselves Christians. I and others aren't spreading fear we're discussing why the Christian religion is in predominance spreading fear amongst each other.

Further, their desperate anticipation of the prophesies written in Revelation. Could the fears of people like this be creating these things?

I agree here about group labeling. Also agree that we should avoid it... I just hope you understand how difficult that is to do when as an American, Religion of the majority is that of Christianity and myself being raised a Christian and could very well be considered a Christian, should I not be able to discuss characteristics of a certain religion of which I'm surrounded by? Should I not be able to discuss the religion that was embraced by our President to bring us into war? Should I not be able to discuss the religion that is both confusing and the cause of much destruction all over the world?

It's not Christianity, it's the face that Christianity has taken on. Again, I'm not trying to bash Christianity I'm trying to discover in conversation why Christianity is and why it uses so much fear. And again, it's far from one instance, all you have to do is search the internet or listen to the Christian news channel.

"red-neck cultists" - seems to describe a lot of Christians who are influential as well as their followers so that doesn't really help to narrow the field. :perplexed:

EVERY Christian I have met longs for the days of persecution... that's all they talk about.

I think Dante should have been banned,

I used the term Christian because it describes exactly the instance that took place in the original post. If we say, American fundamentalist protestants, aren't we talking about American Christianity? Sure there are small sects of different flavors of Christianity but considering I'm living in the US and much of the population calls themselves Christians and likewise their leaders call themselves Christians, it's hard not to use the term Christianity when referring to stuff like this.

I have never met any Christian who takes the revelation seriously, or is planning his/her life around it.

These people make up a very small percentage of Christian believers.

I have never met any Christian who takes the revelation seriously, or is planning his/her life around it.

These people make up a very small percentage of Christian believers.

It's one thing to take Revelations seriously, it's another to take the book literally. I would argue that most Christians take the book seriously, but a minority read the text literally.

Revelations is a serious allegory; Dante's Comedy is a serious allegory. Both should be taken seriously, but neither should be read literally.

Right, that is what I meant...taking the stories of the bible literally, or as historic fact. Most Christians know better...