@kennethamy,
Describing the specifics, of HOW Ontology aims at what WHAT, may be in fact fallible, this, even if Being is not but what it is...
...and that of course, is an epistemic problem just as anything else.
Therefore I can only conclude with humour and a big smile, that asserting such, is/has no mystery, but the self mystery of such wondering...gazing at epistemic epistemic problems that are the very first reason of Philosophy itself must be "new-wave" thinking...go figure !
Its funny, the null set is in the very essence of this debate indeed...
...and yet the debate goes on existing ! :bigsmile:
(I realize that after all the set contains itself in One, which "you", some people call "zero"/null as it has no measure...(its obviously non computable by a smaller factor...))
(...zero is the "Apex" and "Ponex" of so many "Galactic" minds, thriving with self certainty's (of uncertainty) in this forum... a joke "
in itself" I guess !...)