@EmperorNero,
EmperorNero wrote:ughaibu wrote:the burden is on you to show that they are not realisable
No it's not. It's a silly claim to say that the skeptics have to prove a negative.
I'm not asking you to prove a negative. Here it is again; I can type 10, it is thereby established that, for me, typing 10 is possible, likewise with 01. I have now established the existence of two numbers that I can type, 10 and 01. Yet you claim, that my ability, a demonstrated ability, to type both numbers doesn't translate to an ability to type either, when I make my choice. Let's imagine that your claim can be backed up by some kind of proof, and you tell me that I'll choose, for example, 10, what then is stopping me from choosing 01? If there is nothing stopping me, then your claim is false, because regardless of what you "prove" that I'll do, I can do the opposite. Therefore you are committed to the existence of something which blocks one of my options, and that is a positive, not a negative. So, do you have an argument or not?