The Difference Between Causality and Determinism

Get Email Updates Email this Topic Print this Page

Zetherin
 
Reply Fri 8 Jan, 2010 02:43 pm
@prothero,
fast wrote:

My position (at the moment) is that he is always compelled to obey the law since the law is always a compelling force to all. We may overcome the compelling pressure of the law, but that is a difference issue.


So, then, nothing I do which complies with law can be said to be freely done?

If I choose not to kill someone, we must conclude it is because there is this elusive compelling force, not because I freely chose not to kill the person? Even if I know I will suffer consequences if I kill someone, can't I freely choose not to kill someone? Yes, I can.
 
Fil Albuquerque
 
Reply Fri 8 Jan, 2010 02:44 pm
@Amperage,
Amperage;118576 wrote:
please elaborate...


...Intelligent Species are intuitively and progressively aware of this condition...belligerence and confront assume ultimate responsabilitty, witch by coherence I must not believe...
 
Amperage
 
Reply Fri 8 Jan, 2010 02:44 pm
@fast,
fast;118574 wrote:
We may overcome the compelling pressure of the law, but that is a difference issue.
We are always being compelled. But often times we simply compel ourselves.
Someone says "pick a number between 1 and 10". The only thing compelling us to pick any particular number is our own deliberation

---------- Post added 01-08-2010 at 02:45 PM ----------

Zetherin;118577 wrote:
So, then, nothing I do which complies with law can be said to be freely done?

If I choose not to kill someone, we must conclude it is because there is this elusive compelling force, not because I freely chose not to kill the person? Even if I know I will suffer consequences if I kill someone, can't I freely choose not to kill someone? Yes, I can.
let us just hope you aren't "suddenly" compelled to
 
Fil Albuquerque
 
Reply Fri 8 Jan, 2010 02:46 pm
@Amperage,
Amperage;118579 wrote:
We are always being compelled. But often times we simply compel ourselves.
Someone says "pick a number between 1 and 10". The only thing compelling us to pick any particular number is our own deliberation


...prove that there is not a small extra "atom" in your brain leading you to chose 2 rather then 3...
 
Amperage
 
Reply Fri 8 Jan, 2010 02:47 pm
@Fil Albuquerque,
Fil. Albuquerque;118578 wrote:
...Intelligent Species are intuitively and progressively aware of this condition
I hate to keep asking for specifics but I'm just trying to follow you exactly. To which condition are we aware of?
 
Fil Albuquerque
 
Reply Fri 8 Jan, 2010 02:48 pm
@Amperage,
Amperage;118579 wrote:
We are always being compelled. But often times we simply compel ourselves.
Someone says "pick a number between 1 and 10". The only thing compelling us to pick any particular number is our own deliberation

---------- Post added 01-08-2010 at 02:45 PM ----------

let us just hope you aren't "suddenly" compelled to


Serial Killers and assassins are often describe by specialists as being compelled to do it...
 
Amperage
 
Reply Fri 8 Jan, 2010 02:49 pm
@Fil Albuquerque,
Fil. Albuquerque;118582 wrote:
...prove that there is not a small extra "atom" in your brain leading you to chose 2 rather then 3...
may I dissect your brain? Very Happy

I can't...just as you can't prove my will doesn't exist
 
Zetherin
 
Reply Fri 8 Jan, 2010 02:50 pm
@Fil Albuquerque,
Fil. Albuquerque;118582 wrote:
...prove that there is not a small extra "atom" in your brain leading you to chose 2 rather then 3...


I think there is a small extra "atom" in my brain leading me to make a choice. But what does that matter? It doesn't mean who I am is not who I am, and the choices I make are not mine!
 
Fil Albuquerque
 
Reply Fri 8 Jan, 2010 02:51 pm
@Amperage,
Amperage;118584 wrote:
I hate to keep asking for specifics but I'm just trying to follow you exactly. To which condition are we aware of?


Fair...

Causal inevitability ! (or Karma as normal people call it...)

In another Universe the Killer\the beggar\the ignorant could have been me...
 
Amperage
 
Reply Fri 8 Jan, 2010 02:52 pm
@Zetherin,
Zetherin;118588 wrote:
I think there is a small extra "atom" in my brain leading me to make a choice. But what does that matter? It doesn't mean who I am is not who I am, and the choices I make are not mine!
good point...I could simply state that small extra "atom" is my will. And as I have stated...you are correct in that I am being compelled by this small atom....indeed I am being compelled by my will

---------- Post added 01-08-2010 at 02:55 PM ----------

Fil. Albuquerque;118591 wrote:
Fair...

Causal inevitability ! (or Karma as normal people call it...)

In another Universe the Killer\the beggar\the ignorant could have been me...

so what your saying is that humans are intuitively and progressively aware of causal inevitability but we belligerently ignore it and try to assume responsibility for things in which no responsibility can be a asserted and so we have made up laws for no reason and morality is a farce?


**EDIT FOR ADDITIONAL COMMENTS***
In which case we are paradoxically being compelled to think we can take responsibility, something we intuitively know we cant, but by the sheer fact that we are, it means we must be

In case I assert that this would be a contradiction therefore cannot be true

*** ***
 
fast
 
Reply Fri 8 Jan, 2010 02:56 pm
@Zetherin,
[QUOTE=Zetherin;118577]So, then, nothing I do which complies with law can be said to be freely done?[/QUOTE]You can comply with the law of your own free will, as complying with the law can be something that you want to do.
 
Fil Albuquerque
 
Reply Fri 8 Jan, 2010 02:59 pm
@Amperage,
Amperage;118592 wrote:
good point...I could simply state that small extra "atom" is my will. And as I have stated...you are correct in that I am being compelled by this small atom....indeed I am being compelled by my will
ONE ABSOLUTELY UNIFIED REALITY !
 
Zetherin
 
Reply Fri 8 Jan, 2010 03:02 pm
@fast,
fast;118595 wrote:
You can comply with the law of your own free will, as complying with the law can be something that you want to do.


Indeed. It would be of my own free will. So, if I made that right-hand turn, I would be making that right-hand turn of my own free will. The fact that is also complies with the law is besides the point.
 
Amperage
 
Reply Fri 8 Jan, 2010 03:02 pm
@Amperage,
Amperage;118592 wrote:
In which case we are paradoxically being compelled to think we can take responsibility, something we intuitively know we cant, but by the sheer fact that we are, it means we must be

In which case I assert that this would be a contradiction therefore cannot be true
just wanted to move this here since I added it late

---------- Post added 01-08-2010 at 03:05 PM ----------

Fil. Albuquerque;118600 wrote:
ONE ABSOLUTELY UNIFIED REALITY !
so what you are concluding is that if we have a soul which is really us, then all of existence as we know it is an illusion?
From a certain perspective I could go with that
 
fast
 
Reply Fri 8 Jan, 2010 03:09 pm
@Fil Albuquerque,

[/QUOTE]
If the whole world consisted of a jar (20,000,000 atoms) and three gumballs in it (1,000,000 atoms a piece), then you are denying the existence of both the jar and the gumballs but agree that there is one thing (the world) that consists of 23,000,000 atoms.

How'd I do?
 
pagan
 
Reply Fri 8 Jan, 2010 03:09 pm
@Amperage,
i am never convinced by people who claim that free will does not exist. It absolves one of all responsibility. Yet such people don't take advantage of such an amoral position.

In my experience it is exactly the opposite that tends to be true. Those who take advantage of others by breaking state and moral laws, feel they are free and personify it in the face of morality.
 
Fil Albuquerque
 
Reply Fri 8 Jan, 2010 03:12 pm
@fast,
fast;118607 wrote:

If the whole world consisted of a jar (20,000,000 atoms) and three gumballs in it (1,000,000 atoms a piece), then you are denying the existence of both the jar and the gumballs but agree that there is one thing (the world) that consists of 23,000,000 atoms.

How'd I do?


---------- Post added 01-08-2010 at 04:14 PM ----------

pagan;118609 wrote:
i am never convinced by people who claim that free will does not exist. It absolves one of all responsibility. Yet such people don't take advantage of such an amoral position.

In my experience it is exactly the opposite that tends to be true. Those who take advantage of others by breaking state and moral laws, feel they are free and personify it in the face of morality.
 
Amperage
 
Reply Fri 8 Jan, 2010 03:18 pm
@prothero,
so in your case, why would you be being caused to think you can take responsibility for anything?
 
Fil Albuquerque
 
Reply Fri 8 Jan, 2010 03:20 pm
@Amperage,
Amperage;118613 wrote:
so in your case, why would you be being caused to think you can take responsibility for anything?
 
Amperage
 
Reply Fri 8 Jan, 2010 03:22 pm
@Fil Albuquerque,
Fil. Albuquerque;118614 wrote:
purpose would not exist for you
 
 

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 05/04/2024 at 01:52:56