Uncle Jim/Solomon

Max wrote:

If you keep asking the same questions then you will get the same answers.

Actually, Max, I believe this is the second time I have ever responded to you, and the last time certainly had nothing to do with JJT or your membership status in the Family.

Max wrote:

Grow up or shut up !

Love & God Bless

Max, your agression is uncalled for. Also note that personal attacks are against this forum's terms of service.

Monger wrote:

Max wrote:
If you keep asking the same questions then you will get the same answers.

Actually, Max, I believe this is the second time I have ever responded to you, and the last time certainly had nothing to do with JJT or your membership status in the Family.

Max wrote:
Grow up or shut up !

Love & God Bless

Max, your agression is uncalled for. Also note that personal attacks are against this forum's terms of service.

If you attack people then expect a response and your memory is not very good.
Think before you write.

Love & god Bless

Max

max wrote:

I repeat yet again, it would not be irresponsible, something that you should try hard to understand.

I am trying to understand. Perhaps my knowledge of the English language is not that great. Though I do think that if it would *not* be *irresponsible* then Max should go ahead and back his claim to fame and at least give the reference of the Wall Street Journal he or his company appeared in.

I think we should start a thread to study Max. Max will make a very interesting case study. There are some very peculiar attributes to Max. They are seem to be frequent and not mood based. OK, I'm going to start one. Amature psychologists, join me there!

winter wrote:

max wrote:

I repeat yet again, it would not be irresponsible, something that you should try hard to understand.

I am trying to understand. Perhaps my knowledge of the English language is not that great. Though I do think that if it would *not* be *irresponsible* then Max should go ahead and back his claim to fame and at least give the reference of the Wall Street Journal he or his company appeared in.

I think we should start a thread to study Max. Max will make a very interesting case study. There are some very peculiar attributes to Max. They are seem to be frequent and not mood based. OK, I'm going to start one. Amature psychologists, join me there!

I reckon that your knowledge is not great period!
Thanks for dedicating a topic to me, I am honored.

Love & God Bless

Max

Just because one's first language is not your first language, that doesn't make them stupid. Evil or Very Mad

Cookie wrote:

Just because one's first language is not your first language, that doesn't make them stupid.

I think they were using the term in a metaphorical sense!
As to any questions about who or what I am, maybe you and other members of the mutual appreciation society and vocal minority should try â€œlateral thinkingâ€

Yes, lateral thinking is a term very familliar to me. In fact, i think this whole site is devoted to that.

according to the following web dictionary definition, it means

"a heuristic for solving problems; you try to look at the problem from many angles instead of tackling it head-on"

see link for some more definitions.

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&safe=active&defl=en&q=define:Lateral+thinking&sa=X&oi=glossary_definition&ct=title

I think that very much describes the questioning we do about YOU on the thread devoted to coming up with lateral thinking on Max the man/woman.

you don't agree?

by the way, I don't know of any "mutual appreciation society" on this site, and as far as being a "vocal minority", well, on this site, baby, that's YOU.

but you're right if you want to hold us up against TF, in which we'd be outnumbered as far as numbers per opinion as to what our lifestyle should be if we want to please God.

sorry Confused

Cookie wrote:

Yes, lateral thinking is a term very familliar to me. In fact, i think this whole site is devoted to that.

according to the following web dictionary definition, it means

"a heuristic for solving problems; you try to look at the problem from many angles instead of tackling it head-on"

see link for some more definitions.

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&safe=active&defl=en&q=define:Lateral+thinking&sa=X&oi=glossary_definition&ct=title

I think that very much describes the questioning we do about YOU on the thread devoted to coming up with lateral thinking on Max the man/woman.

you don't agree?

by the way, I don't know of any "mutual appreciation society" on this site, and as far as being a "vocal minority", well, on this site, baby, that's YOU.

but you're right if you want to hold us up against TF, in which we'd be outnumbered as far as numbers per opinion as to what our lifestyle should be if we want to please God.

sorry

If it is a term that you are familiar with, I am surprised that you had to resort to a dictionary definition and to compound this by using a definition from a Website!
You really should no better, but then again I think not.
To say that the whole site is devoted to â€œlateral thinkingâ€

max wrote:

If it is a term that you are familiar with, I am surprised that you had to resort to a dictionary definition and to compound this by using a definition from a Website! You really should no better, but then again I think not. Love & God Bless
Max

I'm surprised at your reaction toward a dictionary on the web. Not many of us are geeky enough to carry around dictionary books.

I used a dictionary definition expressly for the reason that if I did not, you most certainly would have come up with your own definition after. I wanted it to be perfectly clear to whoever is reading who would not immediately understand the literal definition. Or do you go by your own definition?

Needless to say, I am familiar with lateral thinking, as it's a major part of the career I have and lateral service and lateral thinking are terms we use every day.

Cookie wrote:

max wrote:
If it is a term that you are familiar with, I am surprised that you had to resort to a dictionary definition and to compound this by using a definition from a Website! You really should no better, but then again I think not. Love & God Bless
Max

I'm surprised at your reaction toward a dictionary on the web. Not many of us are geeky enough to carry around dictionary books.

I used a dictionary definition expressly for the reason that if I did not, you most certainly would have come up with your own definition after. I wanted it to be perfectly clear to whoever is reading who would not immediately understand the literal definition. Or do you go by your own definition?

Needless to say, I am familiar with lateral thinking, as it's a major part of the career I have and lateral service and lateral thinking are terms we use every day.

It is not a question of, and I quote â€œgeeky enoughâ€

LATERAL THINKING to you, Max, is to be open to the group's opinions. but to me, having only known the group, and nothing but for 90% of my life, holding and accepting only their beliefs and opinions, I would say for me lateral thinking is doing exactly what you are accusing me of NOT doing!

But thank you for proving to me as time has gone on, that you're absolutely clueless.

Next time, instead of acting like you're on your period, if my definition is wrong (which it wasn't), feel free to put educate us with what YOUR dictionary says that's so different. eh? Laughing

Cookie wrote:

LATERAL THINKING to you, Max, is to be open to the group's opinions. but to me, having only known the group, and nothing but for 90% of my life, holding and accepting only their beliefs and opinions, I would say for me lateral thinking is doing exactly what you are accusing me of NOT doing!

But thank you for proving to me as time has gone on, that you're absolutely clueless.

Next time, instead of acting like you're on your period, if my definition is wrong (which it wasn't), feel free to put educate us with what YOUR dictionary says that's so different. eh?

Thank you for informing me what my views of lateral thinking are.
I was saddened to hear that for 90% of your life you have been dependent on the beliefs and opinions of others.
However, since you now have a career within secular society I am sure, as you say you will have plenty of opportunities to rectify this and catch up for lost time.
One would hope so and once again may I suggest that you learn about Empathic accuracy.
As for periods darling, I think you need to think more laterally and adopt empathic accuracy.

Love & God Bless

Max

Yes, it is sad. Crying or Very sad

Cookie wrote:

Yes, it is sad.

Try not to be sad better to be glad or mad.
I see the heat is dying down on Pope Ben, now itâ€™s Bangkok
Fancy naming a place Bangkok!
A little of God's Word for your day. Changed daily, so there's always something new.

Love & God Bless

Max

Max, please go ahead and start the thread entitled, "Why Winter Does Not Understand Things?"

I would like to know everyone's opinions. I don't want to comment. It can be for everyone else. I think that is perfectly fair. I have no problem with people discussing me.

The interesting thing is that you seem to take my thread as offence. I made that thread as an accademic study. I thought you really couldn't care less. You seemed to not care about anyone on this forum and verbally assulted people. So I thought rather than become annoyed at you, we can at least study you and learn something.

I am sorry if I offended you. You didn't seem to care about anyone. I really am sorry. I will ask the moderators to delete the thread if you don't like it. I care about how you feel.

Forgive my horrendous spelling.

winter wrote:

Max, please go ahead and start the thread entitled, "Why Winter Does Not Understand Things?"

I would like to know everyone's opinions. I don't want to comment. It can be for everyone else. I think that is perfectly fair. I have no problem with people discussing me.

The interesting thing is that you seem to take my thread as offence. I made that thread as an accademic study. I thought you really couldn't care less. You seemed to not care about anyone on this forum and verbally assulted people. So I thought rather than become annoyed at you, we can at least study you and learn something.

I am sorry if I offended you. You didn't seem to care about anyone. I really am sorry. I will ask the moderators to delete the thread if you don't like it. I care about how you feel.

Forgive my horrendous spelling.

I really have no interest in finding out why you do not understand things, but maybe other people have and it would seem from what you say, that you also have a desire of self-discovery in this direction.
If anyone here wishes to start such a thread, they should not preclude you from entering into dialogue, since to do so would be grossly unfair and dictatorial.
Of course there are some people who don't like freedom to make their own decisions. They would rather have a dictator telling them everything to do.
As to my taking offence, on the contrary, as I have said I am honored that you have dedicated a topic/thread to me, but somewhat non-to honored that you instructed people not to enter into any dialogue with me on said thread, since that would seem to lack academic insight and I understand that this was the purpose of the thread.
I would not wish you to ask the moderators to delete it, since I am a firm believer in that once you start something you should finish it or allow it to run itâ€™s natural course.
It would seem that has started to happen!
I am very pleased that you care about how I feel.
As for your spelling of the word â€œNonchalantlyâ€

Sex
Does masterbating to the image of Jesus turn a person gay

Re: Sex

maxus wrote:

Does masterbating to the image of Jesus turn a person gay

I do not know does it?
Sounds an infantile question, so perhaps best to think about it yourself, but since you seem unable to spell the word correctly you may have difficulty.

Love & God Bless

Max

Re: Sex

maxus wrote:

Does masterbating to the image of Jesus turn a person gay

I wonder if anyone can find the GN where they expressly talk about that. There's a whole GN. or at least a big chunk of a GN devoted to that topic and why you're NOT gay if you do that.

girl and acting out gay is tolerated
guy and a gay sexual act is an excomunicable offense

Homosexuality is permited. If you are male, you have sex with the Jman. Of course I've seen quite a few borderline gay boys in TF. I guess the get a spanking if they more than hug. If you are female, you have sex with your peers and underaged girls. Zerby knows the power of sex. So she makes it her followers daily diet. Since she can't fuck everyone physically, she can fuck their minds and imaginations. If they become addicted to her porno babble, then she can control them.

The saddest thing about it is how deluded they are. I pray many break free from the grip of TF.

xFamily

Uncle Jim/Solomon

Quick Links

My Account

able2know