Fri 10 Apr, 2009 10:58 am - [quote=Mr. Fight the Power]Are we merely placing constraints on what a belief can be, or are we actually identifying what a belief is. It was my understanding that we are seeking out what... (view)
Fri 10 Apr, 2009 09:53 am - Uh... Yeah, I know implies I believe. That's part of our definition. It's on the original post.
I've already given the argument ten times over. You're taking us back over steps... (view)
Fri 10 Apr, 2009 09:10 am - [quote=cypressmoon]There's a lot more to life than propositionally compatible things.[/quote]
Yes, that's why [I]we have no comment on those other things. [/I]
You don't walk into... (view)
Fri 10 Apr, 2009 08:24 am - Ugh. I guess I should not presume you read any of the thread.
Here we go again: Look, we're talking about propositional belief. [I]That [/I]is the kind of belief we're concerned with. We... (view)
Fri 10 Apr, 2009 08:06 am - [quote=cypressmoon]Some beliefs cannot be justified.[/quote]
And which beliefs would fall under this category of "unjustifiable"? Have we mistakenly considered such beliefs in this... (view)
Fri 10 Apr, 2009 07:18 am - [quote=cypressmoon]Are you a Tractatus W., or an Investigations W.?[/quote]
How is that relevant? Do you have a particular passage from either that makes your point clear rather than murky and... (view)
Fri 10 Apr, 2009 07:07 am - [quote=cypressmoon]I don't think x is a man. x is x. x is not y (the actual, whatever that may be). x points to an unknown y (an unknown reality).
If you think otherwise, maybe this... (view)
Thu 9 Apr, 2009 11:22 pm - [quote=kennethamy]The fact is that two persons, A and B, may have exactly the same justification for p, and if it happens that p is true, then A knows that p, and if it happens that p is false,... (view)
Thu 9 Apr, 2009 03:08 pm - [quote=MJA][SIZE=85]Vegetarianisn is a Higher Level View.[/SIZE]
[I]See first that the design is wise and just: that ascertained, pursue it resolutely; do not for one repulse... (view)
Thu 9 Apr, 2009 02:59 pm - Look at it this way: I can be justified even if I am wrong.
A lawyer may make an argument with a false conclusion, but it's not that being false [I]makes [/I]the lawyer's justification... (view)