Fri 2 Apr, 2010 02:57 am - [QUOTE=Extrain;147451]NO. YOU ARE HEARING THAT AS "[B]BE POLICIALLY CORRECT[/B]."
BUT I WON'T! AND I'VE ALREADY COMPLAINED TO MODERATORS ABOUT YOUR CONSTANT COMPLAINING. YOU... (view)
Fri 2 Apr, 2010 01:57 am - [QUOTE=Extrain;147445]By normal conventional rules, the poster should address "Berkeley's Treatise and Dialogues [B]As It Is[/B]"--not how [B]Russell saw the philosopher's work... (view)
Fri 2 Apr, 2010 01:08 am - [QUOTE=Extrain;147431][B]YOU VIOLATED EVERYTHING RUSSELL SAID HERE about WHAT A PHILOSOPHER ACTUALLY DOES[/B].
(1) You haven't [B]EXPLORED [/B]anyquestions, you've [B]ANSWERED[/B] all... (view)
Fri 2 Apr, 2010 12:31 am - [SIZE=85]Thus, to sum up our discussion of the value of philosophy; [/SIZE]
[SIZE=85][COLOR=blue][B]Philosophy[/B] is to be studied, not for the sake of any definite answers[/COLOR][/SIZE]... (view)
Thu 1 Apr, 2010 09:13 pm - [QUOTE=kennethamy;147334]What a surprise!
Trying to philosophize without logic is like trying to row a boat without oars.
I suggest that before you don't respect logic, you learn a little... (view)
Thu 1 Apr, 2010 08:43 pm - [QUOTE=kennethamy;147322]That is not Not what I wrote. I said exactly the opposite. [/QUOTE]Yes you stated the opposite.
What i presented may not have been clear and misleading.
I stated, note... (view)
Thu 1 Apr, 2010 08:26 pm - [QUOTE=kennethamy;147245]Yes. I don't understand what you are writing, and besides, it seems to have nothing to do with my post. I am saying that your premises do not support the conclusion... (view)
Thu 1 Apr, 2010 07:47 am - [SIZE=85][COLOR=black]Kennethamy, [/COLOR][/SIZE]
[SIZE=85][B][COLOR=red]253.[/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=red]At the foundation of well-founded belief lies belief that is not founded.... (view)
