Fri 28 May, 2010 04:22 am - [SIZE=85]In my opinion, infinitesimals are compound parts and not discrete objects, that need proof of existence.[/SIZE] (view)
Tue 25 May, 2010 03:24 am - According to my rationale, the knowledge that everything exists is a compound, is " a priori " justified.
That means, all particulars - things,entities, objects, artifacts - which are... (view)
Wed 21 Apr, 2010 04:45 am - Firstly, according to my rationale, [URL="http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/discreteness"]discreteness[/URL] is solely related to particulars, meaning them as artificial and naming... (view)
Mon 19 Apr, 2010 04:30 am - [QUOTE=awareness;153173]Can infinity exist inside infinity?
or
Does infinity = infinity (yes)
I guess the answer to the question is yes. (no proof available)
(assuming that matter does... (view)
Tue 13 Apr, 2010 03:11 am - [QUOTE=richrf;82947]Hi,
I guess we run into problems with Premise 1, since experiments using classical instruments, do not allow us to understand what is happening at the quantum level (e.g.... (view)
Mon 12 Apr, 2010 06:53 am - [QUOTE=Aedes;82962]Why are we using syllogisms to answer questions about matter? Democritus and Aristotle spent a lot of time on this topic.
But it turns out that their explanations did not stand... (view)
Mon 12 Apr, 2010 06:41 am - [QUOTE=vectorcube;82929]Premise 2 can be challenged, because if space-time is discrete, then it is meaningless to talk of dividing something without space.[/QUOTE]
The space-time continuum is... (view)
Tue 2 Mar, 2010 05:32 am - [B]PREMISE 1: Time is infinitely divisible.[/B]
[B]PREMISE 2: No artificial, unnatural quantity is infinitely [/B][B]divisible.[/B]
[B]CONCLUSION: No time is an artificial, unnatural... (view)
Wed 30 Sep, 2009 04:56 am - [center][center][b][u]syllogism[/u][/b][/center]
[center][b][u][/u][/b] [/center]
[center][u][/u][/center][/center]
[b][u][/u][/b]
[b][u]premise 1[/u][/b]: Time is due to movement.... (view)
