@jeeprs,
jeeprs;109425 wrote:Fair comment. I was being a little disingenuous perhaps. OK, I *am* out to persuade. I would like to be on the winning side of the argument.
But, the problem is that by your own criterion you have a bad argument, since the argument for the conclusion that an argument is a good argument only if it persuades seems to persuade no one (I am not sure even you).
Of course, a bad argument may, nevertheless, have a true conclusion. Logically speaking, the argument that if an argument is a bad argument, then it must have a false conclusion, is a very bad argument. But who knows, since by your lights, such an argument may be found to be persuasive?