@mark noble,
mark noble;172189 wrote:Hi KJ,
I read your opening post, and gathered that it was attempting to provide proof of whether or not God is responsible for the entire message therein, through conduit or directly.
Again, I had wanted to post more, but . . . so many things happening today and tomorrow...I hope all will put up with my absence a bit longer.
Here,
mark noble, I'd like to touch base on this one question. Yes, my position is that biblical texts (and that includes all those within our canons of today {
please note that there is more than one canon out there}) evidence human activity alone, for the extremely greatest part. The few areas where we can 'take it' that information expressed, which seems to have been 'foreshadowing of future events,' could have some other explanation, are still open for discussion, but cannot be supported by the YHWH god-model, nor the Christian god-model, nor any Gnostic god-model, which the bulk of the texts describe and prescribe
.
Thus, no. The texts in our Bible of today do not contain any information which could have come from the god-models those same texts give us, and those texts do not evidence any material degree at all of
supernatural superintendence.
Be back later...I notice some effort by others to apply faulty argumentation towards reasons for early Christian teachings of resurrection events.