Get Email Updates • Email this Topic • Print this Page
I am at a loss. Explain please.
Testing, scientific or otherwise, necessarily implies that the proposition being tested can be proven wrong. Let me switch sides here and hear you provide examples of how my Christian beliefs can be proven wrong.
Yes, I treat religious truth much in the same manner as moral truth. I do practically deny the reality of both.
I do not agree. I think the process of reasoning and the qualia associated with reasoning are subjective, but the rules of reason are objective (although they may not be real) and apply to all human understanding.
I don't believe that the relationship of cause and effect is necessarily true, but I believe it is inherent to human understanding.
The difference between objective and subjective experience is that objective experience is externally verifiable and typically replicable. If I have a spiritual awakening, it is a matter of consciousness alone and I cannot purposefully replicate that or expect another to have experienced it. If I observe the sun rising in the morning, to return to this example, I can expect another to have experienced it and I can reasonably expect it to be replicated in the next morning.