@richrf,
richrf;93331 wrote:So, with that said, do you believe that conflict is intrinsic to the universe and to life? If so, how do you deal with it?
Thanks.
Rich
I always have a hard time with ideas so grand. They seem beyond my comprehension. So, what I do, is break them down into their elements and examine the elements piece by piece. A thing is either a member of a set or it is not. If it is a member of a set, is it part or whole? So, is conflict a part of the universe? certainly. Is it a thing or a form or a material difference? Conflict is the difference between two boundaries- For example, you and I. So, the whole thing would be the terms, you and I, and the difference called conflict. Of this thing, niether you, nor I nor the confilct in of themselves is a thing. No real mystery. Conflict could not exist by iself as a thing. It needs terms, that which we say define, or create the borders of the conflict.
Now, do we deal with the conflict or is the deal of the conflict the difference between you and I?
Oh, I am so confused.
Plato said it correctly, if one cannot distinguish between a thing, a things form, and a things material difference, it is because the mind is not yet functional. Plato used metaphor of course (absolute beauty), and I did not. This is true of any environmental acquisition system. It is not functioning when it can not even distinguish between these three. It cannot abstract from a thing, if it does not know a thing. If it does not abstract a things form, or its material difference, it is not functioning.
However, one might actually pursue the investigation of "the conflict of the conflict" and end up getting Knighted, Like Bertrand Russell. After all, a Theory of Types is a good way to use gibberish to ones popularity!
j.c.