@MySiddhi,
God would be one of those members that signed on at the very beginning, gave a vague introduction and didn't post again, though you could possibly reach it (God) through personal messaging.
Why? If god did post anything, it would (among other things) denote some level of partiality. And partiality is a flaw. If God is a perfect being, he could not be partial. I've been partial to the view of God in the way Aristotle thought of God, an unmoved mover (
of which, note the irony of me being partial... which would mean both I myself am flawed and further my potentially problematic conception as well).
So if I could ask God anything, I don't know if it would directly answer it's e-mail? which is perhaps an angelfire.com account. (As a side note, I am a Roman Catholic and I like grilled cheese sandwiches, so I do not dispute Gods existence, only the form of God's existence. "God" is in a sense a descriptor for unexplainable phenomena? at least that's as far as I have been able to think of it as.)
It's a good hypothetical question Holiday!
But if God could answer a question on the forum, I think I would ask,"how would you describe yourself?"
As another side note, I believe someone should arbitrarily create a user on this forum named God? Think about it, it's a phenomenal brain scratch. A physical (well, digital) embodiment of an abstract concept that could be referenced within both the rational, empirical, and theological frameworks of philosophy. If someone asked for the proof of God, all they need do is link to God (the forum users) introduction since God is among many things an abstract concept. It's a rationalist (and empiricist) catch 22 on theological grounds.