Sun 3 Sep, 2006 10:14 pm - Re: Age Restrictions for Sexual Relationships
[quote="max"]
If you can not find the truth then that is your probelem.[/quote]
I have not said anything about having a problem with... (view)
Sat 2 Sep, 2006 12:22 pm - Re: Age Restrictions for Sexual Relationships
[quote="max"]For those of you who are being misinformed by hostile apostates on this site[/quote]
Please provide a link to this alleged... (view)
Wed 30 Aug, 2006 04:41 pm - I think a case can be made toward latent racism (against aboriginal peoples) in the text but you then proceed to speak of sexism.
In either case I think there are plenty of explicit examples of... (view)
Sun 20 Aug, 2006 09:16 pm - more..
[quote]
> It appears that you linked to the subject posted article with malice
> towards
> me personally.
You don't say? How does it appear so? I find that hard to believe... (view)
Sun 20 Aug, 2006 01:20 pm - Jim still doesn't get what constitutes defamation:
[quote]
Jim,
Weren't you supposed to avail yourself of your lawyer's advice on Monday? You persist in playing 'law'... (view)
Sun 20 Aug, 2006 01:18 pm - He's still at it. This time asking me who 'WC' is (I've actually forgotten).
[quote]
Jim,
You are threatening to sue me and being a general nuisance. I wouldn't even... (view)
Sat 19 Aug, 2006 11:29 pm - Re: Jim LaMattery's feckless legal threats
[quote="Peter Frouman"]
Jim, I once again posted another link to the article - please don't forget to sue me too. I think the... (view)
Sat 19 Aug, 2006 11:16 pm - Still doesn't get it.
His latest email:
[quote]
Dear Robert,
I am assuming that you are speaking for the owner of xfamily.org. It is
necessary for me to address the owner of the... (view)
