Wed 2 Jun, 2010 02:30 pm - Had to edit... was asleep at the wheel and copy/pasted something incorrect from a word document I was typing this argument in to myself some months ago... but it was the wrong save version... I... (view)
Wed 2 Jun, 2010 01:52 pm - I didn't say there wasn't already inequality. It could generate further inequality, or it in and of itself could lead to a world where its improvements allowed for a society in which all... (view)
Wed 2 Jun, 2010 01:40 pm - Firstly, how do you know what the majority opinion is? Do you have a study handy that shows what percentage of the population believes what about the nature of infinity and the many worlds... (view)
Wed 2 Jun, 2010 11:59 am - The assumption is that there are no defects in athletic ability and IQ. Accidental defects are also prohibited from this thought experiment to stay on topic. Sexual aesthetics was not part if the... (view)
Wed 2 Jun, 2010 11:29 am - You may simply state that you disagree and then not read. You've already stated you don't agree. Not reading is not stating you agree.
I didn't drop the conditional if, again, I am... (view)
Wed 2 Jun, 2010 10:07 am - I'm not wasting any of your time. You are free to not read.
Posing a question as a conditional statement does not make it immune to scrutiny. I read very well, and I am examining the... (view)
Wed 2 Jun, 2010 09:23 am - Modal realism is popular, not truth. Even if it is true, the tenants of modal realism pose that all possible worlds are real, not that the worlds are infinite in number. You cannot have a universe... (view)
Tue 1 Jun, 2010 08:24 am - The number of particles cannot be infinite, because infinity is not a number.
Trillions upon trillions... BIG... these are not infinite quantities. One is a specific amount, the other is... (view)
Sun 30 May, 2010 12:59 pm - [QUOTE=TuringEquivalent;170910]but life is good because there is challenge.[/QUOTE]
In the face of the suffering and lack of worth of another life for which this does not hold true, this only... (view)