Reasons For Philosophy

Get Email Updates Email this Topic Print this Page

north
 
Reply Wed 28 Apr, 2010 09:06 pm
@Fido,
Fido;157737 wrote:
Wrong??? Don't count on it; but it is your mistake to make... Enjoy...


for example

what is missing from the " wrong " is the context in which it is given ( the post # )

well... the post #
 
doswizard
 
Reply Wed 28 Apr, 2010 09:07 pm
@kennethamy,
kennethamy;157736 wrote:
And your point is?


I'm not making a Point.

Why are you so Presumptuous? I'm not here because I
need attention. I'm merely Sharing thoughts. If you don't
bother to read deeply into my expression and simply
base every single one of your posts upon your own
particular cynical point of view then I can't help you.


 
north
 
Reply Wed 28 Apr, 2010 09:18 pm
@doswizard,
doswizard;157732 wrote:
Hume noted that there are two Species of Philosophy.

Those concerned with the Abstruse Truth, such as Aristotle pronounced
and the Moral Philosophy of those such as Plato.

Quote:

Aristotle is long decayed, whilst the easy Philosophy of Plato's
goodness remains entirely relevant even today. Why is this?


it is a good thing I would imagine and understood easily by ALL

at least I hope so


Quote:

There must be something relevant to the notion of involving the
limitations of Human Understanding concerning Philosophy and the
Skepticism of Ideals........


the Human understanding has only the bounds on which we put ....

 
kennethamy
 
Reply Wed 28 Apr, 2010 09:42 pm
@Fido,
Fido;157737 wrote:
Wrong??? Don't count on it; but it is your mistake to make... Enjoy...


I guess this is called, "drive by philosophy". You drive by. You shoot without any explanation. You speed ahead. Great technique.
 
doswizard
 
Reply Wed 28 Apr, 2010 10:13 pm
@north,
north;157750 wrote:
doswizard;157732 wrote:
Hume noted that there are two Species of Philosophy.

Those concerned with the Abstruse Truth, such as Aristotle pronounced
and the Moral Philosophy of those such as Plato.



it is a good thing I would imagine and understood easily by ALL

at least I hope so


Well, I'm not discounting Metaphysics.

Nor am I limiting the constraints of the Human
imagination. I am however skeptical of Philosophical
Fantasy. It contains nothing but Sophistry. I agree
with the sharing of Culture, but not to the point of
Overindulgence. This never satisfies the Senses so
much as an awareness of Uniformity and Contiguity.



the Human understanding has only the bounds on which we put ....



I am forced to agree, sir.
 
Fido
 
Reply Wed 28 Apr, 2010 10:31 pm
@north,
north;157741 wrote:
for example

what is missing from the " wrong " is the context in which it is given ( the post # )

well... the post #

post 17, north... and there is no difference between reason and logic...
 
north
 
Reply Wed 28 Apr, 2010 10:40 pm
@Fido,
Fido;157782 wrote:
post 17, north...


continue


Quote:
and there is no difference between reason and logic...


because .......

---------- Post added 04-29-2010 at 01:30 AM ----------

the difference between reason and logic

reason includes , rational and emotions ( and brings in , draws in knowledge )

logic includes just rational
 
 

 
Copyright © 2019 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.02 seconds on 03/24/2019 at 02:05:16