Get Email Updates • Email this Topic • Print this Page
Hi, Zeroone:
Thanks for contributing!
I took a good look around - and, depite my best efforts and intentions, I get more and more frustrated at the way the illustrious scientists in the "Resonance Project" website you quoted above are twisting and turning their "theories" to somehow conform to each other and their beloved science - while everything the say and quote is always just THEORIES - I have my belley full of theories by now and I maintain - unless you can help me visualize truth and help me APPLY it to a common-day challenge - and unless you can put all this into simple and easy-to-understand verbology, then I refuse to be confused by 'scientific facts' that are neither based on natural truth nor stand up under scrutiny. I know that I am uttering motherhood statements here; but how often have you seen these lofty scientific theories crumble to dust when confronted with more modern and updated facts that come closer to the ultimate truth that really should be 'out there' for all of us to see. Nature knows no formulas or theorems - Nature only knows her own immutable laws whether this be cosmology or health.
After more than an hour of sincere and earnest scrutiny, I hightailed out of that site - and I don't think I will return. Their ramblings are infinitely worse (to me) than Dr. Russell's best-intentioned and worst-expressed explanations. He spent a lifetime trying to translate into layman's language what he already knew intuitively. His semantics don't always resonate as scientific facts but more often than not they do as natural truth - and that will ultimately not only survive scientific scrutiny but will also lead us closer to full comprehension of the immutable underlying truth.
The gravitative center of every particle of matter is the telegraphic center of communication, and the electric poles are the channels of communication. By means of this connection, every particle of matter in the universe is gravitatively and radiatively informed of any change of dimension in any other mass.
All mass simultaneously responds to these communications by a sympathetic contractive or expansive readjustment of its own dimensions.
BTW: This is also one concept I couldn't really grasp until now, how exactly this should work, that nothing every moves, but still is able to create this world of seemingly moving reality. I would really be grateful, if anyone could explain this to me (and if possible not in Dr's words, as I couldn't understand it there either:bigsmile:)
Best would be, if somebody could explain to me, what's really happening, when I walk 1 meter in one direction, and why I didn't really move at all.
You are missing the point - Russell's cosmology and physics go BEYOND present-day physics, and its various lofty theories are just that - theories - whereas a reasonable understanding of Russell's physics leaves one with knowledge that can be put to the test and the Windhexe video above is a decent example, and there are others.
Frankly, I was hoping to see some meaningful responses to my explanations. Don't they merit SOME acceptance or even disagreement? Why don't my thoughts stimulate a lively and meaningful dialog here? Maybe I am in the wrong forum!
Hi, Zeroone:
While I cannot deny that consulting Nassim Haramein's site did not exactly enchant me, I in no way want to be counter-productive here nor do I desire to criticize his fine contribution to science. It is I who is limited in my appreciation of his work - and mainly because of too short an exposure to the vast content of his fine site.
As a preference, I just prefer dealing with subjects that "I can sink my teeth into" and that are, let's say, a little closer to my "limited" level of thinking. I just wonder, why is it that I have no trouble understanding and working with Dr. Russell's many books - but Nassim Haramein's "language of science"raises warning flags?
Please accept my appreciation for allowing me to see "the other side of the coin".
Lancelot.
[CENTER]Summer Festival at Swannanoa Palace[/CENTER]
On the weekend of June 13 and 14, 2009, The Center of The One Heart will host its annual Homecoming at Swannanoa Palace & Grounds on Afton Mountain, Virginia - the former home of Walter and Lao Russell and their University of Science and Philosophy.
Guest Speakers
Nassim Haramein
Our keynote speaker will be Nassim Haramein, who will be presenting a cutting edge synthesis of physics, chemistry, biology, and ancient wisdom, delivered in a most accessible and humorous manner. Nassim's website can be found at TheResonanceProject.org. Nassim Haramein has spent most of his life researching and developing a unification theory that lays down the foundation of a fundamental change in our current understandings of physics and consciousness. Mr. Haramein is Research Director of The Resonance Project Foundation, a non-profit organization exploring unification principles and their implications in our world today. The foundation is actively developing a research park on the island of Hawaii where science, sustainable green technology, and permaculture come together.
...
I've contemplated this same question. In all these years the only explanation or hypothesis I could come up with is this. Keely says there are an infinite number of atomoles (origin of matter)* throughout the universe. These are "fertile" neutral centers which IDEA of mind can 'spark' into creative evolution (become a visible particle) through evolutionary concentration ala Russell's materialization concepts. So when we move each atomole is 'sparked' in turn while the one behind goes back to infinite potential while the one ahead fulfills the IDEA of mind. This process is similar to programming a moving object on a computer screen - pixels are turned on and off giving the impression of motion - but it isn't motion at - just seeming motion. Like I said this in only an idea and I do not advocate it's veracity but it does address some of the questions.
*LAW OF MATTER AND FORCE: "Coextensive and coeternal with space and duration, there exists an infinite and unchangeable quantity of atomoles, the base of all matter; these are in a state of constant vibratory motion infinite in extent, unchangeable in quantity, the initial of all forms of energy."
"Atomoles are elementary units of matter uniform in size and weight, and exist in solid, liquid, gaseous, and isolated forms."
"Atomolini are ultimate units of atomoles, and when in a liquid state are the media for the transmission of gravism. The illimitable divisibility and aggregation of matter is a logical sequence."
"Atoms are multiple combinations of atomoles, and they also exist in solid, liquid, gaseous, and isolated forms."
"Electricity is the oscillation of the atomoles of an atom."
"Gravism is the transmissive form (of energy) through a medium of atomoles in the fourth state, or a medium composed of atomolini."
"Gravity is the mutual attraction of atomoles."
First of all WELCOME Dale! :bigsmile:
So glad to see you here on this forum and looking forward for more of your posts!
This needs futher discussion and comparison with Dr's work:
"INITIAL IMPULSE"
Pressure zones
"Gravity exerts no force, whatsoever, to neither attract or repel.
Gravity is a shaft of Magnetic Stillness which has been extended two ways from zero in the cathode of the electric current, around which electric motion can simulate the power - or energy - of its Magnetic zero center. Gravity is motionless and changeless."
W.R. Atomic Suicide? page 139
Pressure zones
"EVERY EFFECT of motion, whatsoever, in this universe is an electric effect." W.R.
"Gravity is motionless and changeless." W.R.
Further comments expected.
Zeroone
Zeroone,
Thank you for your welcome. I'm glad to be here where I hope to encounter some few people who are actually and sincerely interested in developing understandings of our universe along the lines laid down by Keely, Russell and a few others.
I would like to reply to the rest of your post but what you've typed between quotes of my previous post is not clear to me. For instance, what am I supposed to do with "INITIAL IMPULSE" or " Pressure zones "?
If you w/could state your questions or statements with a bit more clarity I might be able/willing to respond.
Dale
Matter, Force, Space, Duration, Infinite, State of constant vibratory motion, Unchangable, The initial af all forms of energy.
Your work Dale is very significant. Your website contains a lot of information about John Worrell Keely and cosmology.
What I'm trying to do here is compare some of Keely and Russells work.
And I apologize for not being clear enough about Initial Impulse and Pressure zones. I'll try to clear this out, even though it will require some time.
*LAW OF MATTER AND FORCE: "Coextensive and coeternal with space and duration, there exists an infinite and unchangeable quantity of atomoles, the base of all matter; these are in a state of constant vibratory motion infinite in extent, unchangeable in quantity, the initial of all forms of energy."
Let's find some keywords from above state:
Let's find some keywords from above state:
Now let's see what Dr. thinks about that:
"The undivided and unconditioned Light of Mind is an eternal state of rest.
That invisible Light of the Spirit is the eqilibrium of absolute balance and abstolute stillness, which is the foundation of the divided and pressure conditioned universe of motion...
The Light of Mind is the zero falcrum of the wave lever from which motion is projected. Its zero condition is eternal. ..." W.R. A new concept of the universe - The undivided light p.12
"...Our moon is not one minute old in cosmic time. It could, therefore, have no 'initial impulse'...." W.R. A new concept of the universe - Regarding "Initial Impulse" p.46
"Any form of matter becomes another form of matter if its pressure condition is changed. Nature perpetually changes one form of matter into another by perpetually changing its pressure conditions. ..." W.R. A new concept of the universe - The new concept of matter p.65
"The birth of any body from izs falcrum zero to its zero of maturity and back again to its falcrum is a cycle. Cycles of wave vibrations in an electric current, or in a musical note where the vibrations are so fast that the sound is heard as a continuous tone, are known as wave frequencies. ..." W.R. A new concept of the universe - Vibrating matter - the root principle of atomic structure p.81
This are just quotes and in order to understand them man has to read whole sections or whole book.
It would be very interesting to make some more comparisons.
But this is not enough - we have to extend this knowledge by adding more personal thoughts and opinions.
Zeroone
"The "key word" concept won't work so well here, IMHO. Perhaps "key concepts" would be better working method. We definitely do need definitions that work for everyone. You see I see little conflict between what Keely and Russell each wrote about. (You do realize we have far more material generated by Russell than Keely? Keely's writings have vanished and those who do have them refuse to share.)"
We could say "key concepts" no problem with that.
But fifteen above quotes are totaly strange to me.
I mean - take the word "atomolic" for instance.
Than "intermolecular substance" and so on. What is he talking about? What's the equivalent in todays modern physics terms for this words, phrases, sentences?
Can anyone translate above statements so we might be able to find common points with Russell?
Zeroone