Frankly, I was hoping to see some meaningful responses to my explanations. Don't they merit SOME acceptance or even disagreement? Why don't my thoughts stimulate a lively and meaningful dialog here? Maybe I am in the wrong forum!
Your're quite impatient:bigsmile:. First give people time to come across this forum, then give them time to read this, and then give them time to answer.
As you so vehemently asked for any thoughts about it, I will throw in my idea what's happening, and this is actually quite the other way as yours :bigsmile:.
But first I have to say, that I really never would tell anyone I understood Dr's cosmogony. So what I say, needn't have any relation to truth.
I share your ideas of the first part of your post. But I think what is built here is not the 2 cones which meet their apexes, but which bore through each other, so developing a mainly discharging condition. Where one cone is visible, and the other invisible.
He is very secretive about the inner workings of his apparatus, and I guess he is right - there is nothing to explain!!!
Well he's not that secretive about his invention as you can download his patent right here: PAT2PDF - Free PDF copies of patents: Download and print!
(Patent Nr 6971594)
And I do believe him, that he really doesn't know why exactly it works.
to the point (pun intended) that the pressures and speed are so incredibly high at the bottom of the cone (bottom meaning internal apex) that anything within that moving condensing and compressing air mass within the cone is simply reduced to a fine powder, be it glass or metal or a simple rock.
Well exactly at this most important point, where it would be interesting why, you just say, it happens, but don't explain why. Why should this condensing compressing mass of air pulverize and dry anything, but without heating/burning it?
Mind you - the funnel (cone) needs to be pretty robust to withstand all that pressure and grinding; but that aspect seems to have been resolved very well by the 'inventor'.
Well If you look at this from a pure conventional mechanical viewpoint: The grinding cannot happen by impact on the exterior, as the funnel could only withstand these forces for a very short time.
As we know a Tornado has a low air pressure zone in the middle. As we also know, in a Tornado charge separation is happening, positive in the middle and negative on the outside (this also Schauberger described).
Well, this is how I understand it, maybe how it could work.
In a Tornado all heavy masses will be gathered in the middle low air pressure zone. As we know, heavy masses have a high accumulated potential. The fast centrifugal action at the base of the cone forces disintegration. Therefore matter is stimulated to negative discharge in the equator plane of the cone (this is IMHO why the outer rim of the cone of a Tornado is negatively charged...).
The matter in the funnel exhales in a outward spiral and inhales from it's center. Like that the matter in the center discharges more and more. And by the way of discharge it starts to lower potential and starts to repel. Like that, the matter will be able to get more and more out of the center of the funnel, as it seeks like pressure conditions. At the same time the repellent forces of the atoms will be increased. This actually results, that the matter will become much less stable, and either tear apart by itself, or at the end will be smudged against the wall of the funnel, but as it is now much less dense, it will easily break apart and the funnel will not be much affected.
The water itself will easily "evaporate" due to the low pressure conditions, and by that I don't even mean the air pressure or the temperature, as my experiments have shown, that it is very easy to evaporate or condense water just by changing potential pressure (air pressure and temperature not altered).
At the end as the matter is still heavier than the rest, it will be able, as it is now at the outside of the cone, to go down the cone and as the potential pressure increases there, it will also start to get it's original potential back. By the time it's again in the conventional "earth" pressure it behaves the same as before. But it is now dust.
The water which has evaporated due to the low pressure condition will rise against gravity, and will come out of the upper exhaust, together with the air.
Unseen would be the cycle of the negative discharge as it again enters through the poles to charge.
Well as I said before, I have no problem if people think this is complete bs, as it probably is :bigsmile:
But you wanted to have some comments...
Well, if I think again about it, according to my opinion there would be a lack of some points that would be needed to really make the desintegration that strong that this can happen. So I would doubt that one is able to create like that the needed pressure conditions for this idea. But anyway, I think every contribution is helpful, as it keeps the creativity alive...
And my experimental experience in such mechanical devices, like Schauberger occupied himself, are zero.