Now they are saying there should be more planets based on the current criteria.
As kennethamy pointed out, that's not relevant to the matter at hand, but also, it's incorrect (which is also not relevant to the thread's subject, but if we're nitpicking, let's at least nitpick properly
Actually, the link you provide is to a comment on one of the proposed definitions of "planet"
before the 2006 decision
that established a different definition.
So, no new definition any time soon.