Something I found.

Future possibilities are preexisting realities in never ending reflections of its own body, in a sort of Indra's pearls fashion. From it being a forever reflection of a pebble's self rippling outward like a domino effect of actualities, thus giving explanation toward time's arrow. A reflection of actuality through time allows for the possibility of change of state of actuality. Time's arrow also communicates the efficacy of physical systems innate evolution toward states of lower order, conforming with principles such as those of entropy.

Tell me what you think.

Do you mean Future possibilities are the reflections of preexisting realities? You went from plural "possibilities" and "realities" to the singular "it's own body" in the same sentence so that first sentence is very confusing no matter what Indra says unless plurality and singularity are both illusions.

can imagine one pebble dropped in a pool producing never ending ripples only if absent things like gravity, wind resistance, and of course the shoreline that these never-ending ripples will eventually run up against. But perhaps the pool is infinite and the forces that calm the waves (gravity etc.) are not present. Then we have infinite ripples for ever and ever i.e. no entropy no settling down into states of lower order just never ending ripples in an ever widening circumference.

Is there more than one preexisting reality?

consider this: Is there more than one node in Indra's Net? Is there more than one pebble tossed into the infinite pool? Perhaps an infinite number of pebbles so that there is no center to the net? So that the interference patterns of these never ending ripples eventually or rather immediately flat-line into the calm sea of entropy?

Time is just a container for 3 dimensional objects. The past, present, and future are all parts of this specific object, so to put it in familiar terms, the past, present, and future all happen "simultaneously".

Time is just a container for 3 dimensional objects. The past, present, and future are all parts of this specific object, so to put it in familiar terms, the past, present, and future all happen "simultaneously".

Time isn't necessarily analogous to a pool of water or a series of possibilities. Time may simply be the 4th dimension, one that contains all objects in the 3rd, a static and specific object itself, with specific characteristics. The perception of time flowing and changing may only be the relationship between sets of information contained in multiple three-dimensional objects. The future is no more significant than the present or the past. Just like any other discrete object, it doesn't actually have an "end", a "front", or a "back". Those things only exist in the relationship between sets of information in a brain system.

We simply can't observe this dimension in its totality. It seems to me that things don't actually "happen", but simply exist in the entirety of this dimension. To demonstrate this, pick up a pencil. Let's call the eraser the "past", the wood the "present" and the tip of the graphite the "future". The pencil is an object, and time is an object. "Which one is happening first?" is a meaningless question. Viewed from a 5th dimension, which contains all the 4th, the totality of this dimension can be seen "all at once". Time is just a container for 3 dimensional objects. The past, present, and future are all parts of this specific object, so to put it in familiar terms, the past, present, and future all happen "simultaneously".

I see this relationship between the first 3 dimensions and the fourth not as change, but as certainty. Due to cause and effect and the simultaneous totality of time both being in effect, change is illusory. Nothing has ever changed. All things have "always been", not for units of time, but in the totality of time. In this sense, time is not eternal because it continues onward or backward, but because it exists in the eternal instance of its full "shape".

I see this relationship between the first 3 dimensions and the fourth not as change, but as certainty. Due to cause and effect and the simultaneous totality of time both being in effect, change is illusory. Nothing has ever changed. All things have "always been", not for units of time, but in the totality of time. In this sense, time is not eternal because it continues onward or backward, but because it exists in the eternal instance of its full "shape".

I do not think change is illusory for change does exist, in the container we would imagine of all moments coexisting so although all the reflections of states of the same body that we subjectively arrange in sequence of past present future exist simultaneously in no particular order that is all that is illusory, however variants of change of state of the body would continue to exist.

Right. It all depends on how one defines change?

I can see through time and have proven it.

Well what use is it to know something before it happens and not do something about it in some way. It is like anything - knowledge is nothing and completey useless if it can not be used in some way.

Therefore also giving me great skill....and effectively a leader....because I am there first. Anything that is first is the leader!! Or can you proove otherwise?

For me it is not vsions so much as 'feel' I feel things before they happen. And I can tell you tha great things are heading our way......I feel itdeeply. That also effectively means that I am deeply great!! Right through. Am I heading your way? Maybe!!

It also means I have the most powerful mind in recorded history.

How did you go about this? I am very interested.



But what if you knew of a spider crawling on you and you foresaw that a hysteric attempt to shake it off would only aggravate the spider resulting in you getting bitten? I doubt that with this knowledge you would then fail to remain calm as to not aggravate the spider thereby avoid getting bitten, but this would falsify your philosophy of there being no use in knowing something and not doing anything about it as indeed you did know but you took no action and remained still, but by remaining still you would have executed a voluntary action thereby taking the action of taking no action, a paradox.



I am very certain that a president is considered the leader of a country, however when that country goes to war the president does not lead in front of them but rather sits sound at a long distance away in a safe location.



Wouldn't it be if great things are headed my way? and would that not imply that you would not be great until these great things have come about to actuality since what is not yet, cannot yet poses attributes?

I thought you were already heading my way? But if I were to come to you this would imply that if my way is to head your way than your way is my way which is the way of your original way.



Is that true?

How did you go about this? I am very interested.



But what if you knew of a spider crawling on you and you foresaw that a hysteric attempt to shake it off would only aggravate the spider resulting in you getting bitten? I doubt that with this knowledge you would then fail to remain calm as to not aggravate the spider thereby avoid getting bitten, but this would falsify your philosophy of there being no use in knowing something and not doing anything about it as indeed you did know but you took no action and remained still, but by remaining still you would have executed a voluntary action thereby taking the action of taking no action, a paradox.



I am very certain that a president is considered the leader of a country, however when that country goes to war the president does not lead in front of them but rather sits sound at a long distance away in a safe location.



Wouldn't it be if great things are headed my way? and would that not imply that you would not be great until these great things have come about to actuality since what is not yet, cannot yet poses attributes?

I thought you were already heading my way? But if I were to come to you this would imply that if my way is to head your way than your way is my way which is the way of your original way.



Is that true?

Something I found.

Future possibilities are preexisting realities in never ending reflections of its own body, in a sort of Indra's pearls fashion. From it being a forever reflection of a pebble's self rippling outward like a domino effect of actualities, thus giving explanation toward time's arrow. A reflection of actuality through time allows for the possibility of change of state of actuality. Time's arrow also communicates the efficacy of physical systems innate evolution toward states of lower order, conforming with principles such as those of entropy.

Tell me what you think.

I have correct theories for time - which have been proven (correctly) I can see through time. Because of this I can also see much that others can not see. Effectively contributing new and important information to science and new information to pshycology.