Ontological relativity( W.V. Quine)

Get Email Updates Email this Topic Print this Page

kennethamy
 
Reply Mon 26 Oct, 2009 08:45 am
@Fil Albuquerque,
Fil. Albuquerque;99833 wrote:
For instance Quantic Mechanics and Corpuscular Theory address matter behaviour in a different way, and you say that is not relevant...


But, what has any of this to do with the question of the thread? Why not stay with the question instead of wandering about all over the place. Forgetting about matter, what does it mean to say that an elephant exists, but a mermaid does not exist. You can answer that without even mentioning quantum mechanics. Most people do who have never even heard of quantum mechanics. We can talk about something without talking about everything at once. If we do that, we may get somewhere, instead of ending up in total confusion, and not settling anything at all.
 
Fil Albuquerque
 
Reply Mon 26 Oct, 2009 10:20 am
@kennethamy,
kennethamy;99835 wrote:
But, what has any of this to do with the question of the thread? Why not stay with the question instead of wandering about all over the place. Forgetting about matter, what does it mean to say that an elephant exists, but a mermaid does not exist. You can answer that without even mentioning quantum mechanics. Most people do who have never even heard of quantum mechanics. We can talk about something without talking about everything at once. If we do that, we may get somewhere, instead of ending up in total confusion, and not settling anything at all.


Straight to the point...you have no way of proving that your conception of an Elephant corresponds to an Elephant...You perceive something that you conceptualize as being an Elephant, but what it is itself you can?t tell...simple !

...SO WHEN YOU SPEAK OF ELEPHANTS YOUR NOT THAT FAR WAY FROM MERMAIDS...

(...by the way, I am not confused...i can clearly see the point in everything i mention before, as you can, I?m certain...)

You know what this sounds like?

...( I say ) Look there?s a Mermaid over there, (and you say) no, no, actually It?s Super Man !...

give me a break !...

Regards>FILIPE DE ALBUQUERQUE

---------- Post added 10-26-2009 at 11:41 AM ----------

...now, what we can speak and just up to a certain point, is in equivalence of Concepts, and Cosmogony?s...
 
kennethamy
 
Reply Mon 26 Oct, 2009 11:38 am
@Fil Albuquerque,
Fil. Albuquerque;99852 wrote:
Straight to the point...you have no way of proving that your conception of an Elephant corresponds to an Elephant...You perceive something that you conceptualize as being an Elephant, but what it is itself you can?t tell...simple !

...SO WHEN YOU SPEAK OF ELEPHANTS YOUR NOT THAT FAR WAY FROM MERMAIDS...



Regards>FILIPE DE ALBUQUERQUE

---------- Post added 10-26-2009 at 11:41 AM ----------

.....


I really must take you to the Zoo one day and point out an elephant to you. But, of course, you can look up elephants in many places. You know there are elephants, and you know there are no mermaids. No point in arguing just for the sake of arguing, is there? It is just a waste of time. The real issue is what is it that is meant by there are elephants, and there are no mermaids. Let us forget the silliness. And let's talk about what it means to say there are elephants and no mermaids, instead of talking about the pointless nonsense of whether or not there are elephants or mermaids. That is really just argument for argument's sake. If you think there are no mermaids and not elephants, then fine. But then, what does that mean? That is the question posed by this thread.
 
Fil Albuquerque
 
Reply Mon 26 Oct, 2009 02:03 pm
@kennethamy,
Quote:
If you think there are no mermaids and not elephants, then fine. But then, what does that mean? That is the question posed by this thread.


OK fair !

What I mean mainly is that a don?t Know what there are...
 
kennethamy
 
Reply Mon 26 Oct, 2009 02:07 pm
@Fil Albuquerque,
Fil. Albuquerque;99906 wrote:
OK fair !

What I mean mainly is that a don?t Know what there are...


You don't know there are elephants, and that there are no mermaids? Hmm.
 
Fil Albuquerque
 
Reply Mon 26 Oct, 2009 02:17 pm
@kennethamy,
kennethamy;99908 wrote:
You don't know there are elephants, and that there are no mermaids? Hmm.


Close...I don?t know what Elephants in fact are beyond my perception of them...:a-ok:
 
kennethamy
 
Reply Mon 26 Oct, 2009 02:44 pm
@Fil Albuquerque,
Fil. Albuquerque;99910 wrote:
Close...I don?t know what Elephants in fact are beyond my perception of them...:a-ok:


If they are in the Zoo, and you are not in the Zoo, then, no doubt that is true. Going to the Zoo would fix that.Then you will be able to see them. But what would that have to do with whether you know that there are elephants? I am not in the Zoo, but I know that there are elephants. I don't have to see the elephants to know there are elephants. No more than I have to see Portugal to know that there is a country called Portugal.
 
Fil Albuquerque
 
Reply Mon 26 Oct, 2009 02:55 pm
@kennethamy,
kennethamy;99912 wrote:
If they are in the Zoo, and you are not in the Zoo, then, no doubt that is true. Going to the Zoo would fix that.Then you will be able to see them. But what would that have to do with whether you know that there are elephants? I am not in the Zoo, but I know that there are elephants. I don't have to see the elephants to know there are elephants. No more than I have to see Portugal to know that there is a country called Portugal.


In other words you are certain that perception equals reality while I think its equivalent but not equal...in both cases its a belief...

...as you probably noted i tend to go against Scholastic...
...to many objects and Bureaucracy, to little Wisdom...
...for me EQUIVALENCE is the word...
 
kennethamy
 
Reply Mon 26 Oct, 2009 03:02 pm
@Fil Albuquerque,
Fil. Albuquerque;99914 wrote:
In other words you are certain that perception equals reality while I think its equivalent but not equal...in both cases its a belief...


No, I am not certain of anything much. But, I don't have to be certain that there are elephants to know that there are elephants. In other words I know, beyond all reasonable doubt that there are elephants, and that there are no mermaids. But not beyond all doubt. And, I don't have to perceive elephants to know that there are elephants. And, neither do you.
 
Fil Albuquerque
 
Reply Mon 26 Oct, 2009 03:06 pm
@kennethamy,
Quote:
And, I don't have to perceive elephants to know that there are elephants. And, neither do you.


How come ? Don?t follow...
 
kennethamy
 
Reply Mon 26 Oct, 2009 03:12 pm
@Fil Albuquerque,
Fil. Albuquerque;99916 wrote:
How come ? Don?t follow...


I have other means of knowing that they exist. For example, I can look them up on the internet. Or in an encyclopedia. Don't you know there is a country called Nepal. Have you ever seen it? How do you know that Portuguese is spoken in Brazil? Have you been there? I have not, but I know it is.
 
Fil Albuquerque
 
Reply Mon 26 Oct, 2009 03:15 pm
@vectorcube,
That?s also perception...And there is Social perception...dont tell me that you think that the Sun goes around Earth just because people use to think so...besides, even if Social Perception as common grounds it never matches Individual perception...we are unique precisely because of the Space/Time place that we occupy each in our position...so the room seams different but is the same...nevertheless we are not the room...the room is a Phenomena with different manifestations for different Observers...
 
kennethamy
 
Reply Mon 26 Oct, 2009 03:23 pm
@Fil Albuquerque,
Fil. Albuquerque;99919 wrote:
That?s also perception...And there is Social perception...dont tell me that you think that the Sun goes around Earth just because people use to think so...besides, even if Social Perception as common grounds it never matches Individual perception...


What does the fact that people used to think the Sun goes around the Earth to do with my knowing about anything? I know that there is a letter in my postbox because the postman brought it. Don't I? I don't know what is meant by "Social Perception". But I know many things indirectly, by inference. And that includes by knowing that there is a country called Japan, although I have never been there. And I don't suppose you have ever been to Nepal, but you know there is such a country, nevertheless. Don't you?
 
Fil Albuquerque
 
Reply Mon 26 Oct, 2009 03:25 pm
@kennethamy,
kennethamy;99921 wrote:
What does the fact that people used to think the Sun goes around the Earth to do with my knowing about anything? I know that there is a letter in my postbox because the postman brought it. Don't I? I don't know what is meant by "Social Perception". But I know many things indirectly, by inference. And that includes by knowing that there is a country called Japan, although I have never been there. And I don't suppose you have ever been to Nepal, but you know there is such a country, nevertheless. Don't you?


You might at best Know that there is something, but not what...
 
kennethamy
 
Reply Mon 26 Oct, 2009 05:55 pm
@Fil Albuquerque,
Fil. Albuquerque;99922 wrote:
You might at best Know that there is something, but not what...


I know there is a country called, "Portugal". Don't you? And I know there is a country called, "Spain". Don't you?
 
Fil Albuquerque
 
Reply Mon 26 Oct, 2009 08:01 pm
@kennethamy,
kennethamy;99951 wrote:
I know there is a country called, "Portugal". Don't you? And I know there is a country called, "Spain". Don't you?


What Portugal is I don?t know in fact i would very much appreciate your help...

Fernando Pessoa with is heteronim Bernardo Soares, one of many, in is unique "Book of Disquiet" would certainly explain it better than me...
(if you don?t know this writer, especially this book, and you love literature, get it...goggle him for some background, for many one of the 10 best writers ever)

Regards>FILIPE DE ALBUQUERQUE
 
kennethamy
 
Reply Tue 27 Oct, 2009 12:53 am
@Fil Albuquerque,
Fil. Albuquerque;99979 wrote:
What Portugal is I don?t know in fact i would very much appreciate your help...

Fernando Pessoa with is heteronim Bernardo Soares, one of many, in is unique "Book of Disquiet" would certainly explain it better than me...
(if you don?t know this writer, especially this book, and you love literature, get it...goggle him for some background, for many one of the 10 best writers ever)

Regards>FILIPE DE ALBUQUERQUE


You can easily look up Portugal using Google, or some other search engine. And Spain too. I wonder why you (and others who philosophize) say they do not know things they obviously do know, and they would say that they knew if they were not philosophizing.

Thank you for tip.
 
 

 
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 03/04/2026 at 06:01:58