@GoshisDead,
In modern western thinking, rights are actually a subset of freedom in ideological sense; or rather rights is a manifestation of freedom. It is only in this ideal of the Enlightenment, and this general notion of individualism where the notion of freedom reigns supreme, where all it truly means is a set of rights, a certain set of rules and legislation granting people to do as they see fit in various situations.
Though in truth, when one refers to "Rights", what is being intended here is the conformity to standards, the opposite of oppression, the notion that one has the "right" to proper living, one has a "right" to work where one chooses, one has the "right" to carry arms, etc. etc. - or in other words, that these are not "wrongs".
Freedom reflects a different notion, it is essentially the right to deviate in general. One is "Free" to do something, if he wishes; it is not particularly his right to do it, it is not a canonized action, it is not sanctioned, but it is included within the subset of being free.
Thus while indeed in some perspectives freedom can be a subset of rights and vice versa, they refer to different directions and different cultural outlooks. In western society there is a popular discourse to deviate, to be free, to be individual etc. - this individualism itself expresses itself via
freedom, not rights. One is "Free" to do things, one is granted
agency to act within the breadth of this freedom, one is
free to think, but yet we do not say one has the right to think.
One has the right to equality, but we do not say one is
free to be equal. Rights refer to a legislative power, they refer to the confines, limits, constraints, logic, and categorization imposed by a power; when one has a right, it becomes, to some extent, a cultural obligation or at least a cultural, collective expression to partake, to relish in that right.
What the priest was most likely referring to was the fact that people wish not to deviate, that individualism and the impetus to deviate is not natural. People do not wish to be contrary, they do not wish to argue with others, they do not want to form their own world, but rather to be part of somethiing else, to have their rights delegated to them etc.