Reply
Sun 23 Aug, 2009 04:11 pm
According to robert nozick in his book philosophical explanation. We can think of a predicate P as defined the universe U into three region. There are
1) They are: { x: Px is true}
2) They are: { x: Px is false}
3) They are: {x: Px is a categorical mistake}
3 is a bit comfusing, so i will explain. Think of the statement:
Blue taste good
The predicate "taste good" presuppose the set of all foods that we can smell, and blue is not a food at all. It is a categorical mistake to apply blue to the predicate. 3 say that P distinquish the set x, such that Px is a category mistake.
Ok, you ask. So what?
Well, this means when you think about a predicate, you are ontologically commit to 3 classes of things.
@vectorcube,
How is a category mistake a class of things?
@jgweed,
jgweed;85193 wrote:How is a category mistake a class of things?
no it is not. It is used to partition a class of things in which the a given predicate does not apply.