Ruthless Logic wrote:
The only conflation to occur, is your continued integration of idealistic premises and the ensuing adaptability of carelessly pathetic considerations and their related Utopian goals.
I made an argument about the topic, you responded with a commentary about me.[/SIZE] Feel free to be fervent about the topic, but please keep your fervor on the topic and not on your feelings about other members of the forum.
Your entry-level juxtaposition of natural vs. artificial is indicative of your approachments for consideration.
Artificial products have always existed as it pertains to their component truths, just as the behavior of Human Beings will always be subjected to the constraints of the Natural World and the impositions that hold forth.
Indeed, as has our social and cognitive ability to generate the idea of peace and then observe it or strive for it within our societies. The idea of "logic" is actually less innately "natural" than the idea of "peace", because at least "peace" corresponds to a potentially observable set of circumstances.