Wrong??? Don't count on it; but it is your mistake to make... Enjoy...

And your point is?

Hume noted that there are two Species of Philosophy.

Those concerned with the Abstruse Truth, such as Aristotle pronounced
and the Moral Philosophy of those such as Plato.

Quote:

Aristotle is long decayed, whilst the easy Philosophy of Plato's
goodness remains entirely relevant even today. Why is this?

it is a good thing I would imagine and understood easily by ALL

at least I hope so

Quote:

There must be something relevant to the notion of involving the
limitations of Human Understanding concerning Philosophy and the
Skepticism of Ideals........

the Human understanding has only the bounds on which we put ....

Wrong??? Don't count on it; but it is your mistake to make... Enjoy...

doswizard;157732 wrote:

Hume noted that there are two Species of Philosophy.

Those concerned with the Abstruse Truth, such as Aristotle pronounced
and the Moral Philosophy of those such as Plato.



it is a good thing I would imagine and understood easily by ALL

at least I hope so

Well, I'm not discounting Metaphysics.

Nor am I limiting the constraints of the Human
imagination. I am however skeptical of Philosophical
Fantasy. It contains nothing but Sophistry. I agree
with the sharing of Culture, but not to the point of
Overindulgence. This never satisfies the Senses so
much as an awareness of Uniformity and Contiguity.



the Human understanding has only the bounds on which we put ....

I am forced to agree, sir.

for example

what is missing from the " wrong " is the context in which it is given ( the post # )

well... the post #

post 17, north...

and there is no difference between reason and logic...