I'm aware you did not attack her here. My concern was that personal attacks from other websites would be continued here. (Yes, porcelain dDoll AScheick and others will bring their groupie friends here and cause a stir and trouble, and then you may be forced to supposedly kick me out because they will cause such a vile debate. This is their modus operandi, and alaways has been. They can't respond civilly so they start name calling and their group attack. They can;t stay on topic objectively so start a subjective attack and false accussations.) You were also banned on NDN (Thank the Lord, as that was why I could progress and make my own site., and the three BB and the two newsgroups... This even though I was respectful even aaginst the wrath and vile that was hurled against me.... see this board for the same sort of attacks.) and I would personally like to avoid a debate here about the enforcement of other private forums' terms of service. (Exactly, have some standards and follow civil discourse for ALL even ask Jack to get under control and be civil. I have done nothing wrong Here and yet they accuse me of supposed evils on other boards. tell them to reframe and be fair. But then again the majority of moderaters here might be anti-Christian, so it might be unlikely that a Christian poster could survive here via freedom of speech, as that seems reserved for others who have not the Christian faith. But we shall see... the choice and responsibility is yours. )
If James wrote and believes in Incest as Porcelain Doll suggested, I would suggest that James would need a warning not I.
She didn't say James was pro incest. (Yes she inferred James was pro incest because of a supposed email he wrote. This is a serious accussation. A very serious accussation made on a thread where apparrently Monger was having fun with James. If true, Porcelain Doll should have started a whole new threrad, about her accussation and verify it. If accused, James should be contasted and accused openly not secretly)
She said he defended Berg's incestuous relationship with Mene as loving. His comment in this regard can be found on MovingOn. (Yes and if true that is not as bad as being an incestor and yet backing incest is still a crime, just like a liar is to blame and those that believe a lie. Just like trouble makers can be offenders, just like to a lesser degree those that turn their backs and allow trouble makers to cause tyrouble)
Monger, please explain why Porcelain Doll can say the folowing and you don't warn her.
"""""Jay, I was going to ignore all your rants on this board. I am still quite upset at you for your behavior and attacks at me personally on NDN when I thought we at least were some sort of friends, using a psuedonym and making those ridiculous comments and accusations sort just rubbed me the wrong way.""""
She attacking using the very pointed and inflamatory words like 'rants' 'rubbed' 'attacks' 'upset' and 'ridicul;ous'... why are her words deemed a civil exchange when they have no revelance to this board.
This board certainly does not preclude disagreement on issues, even when said disagreements are strongly worded. There is a difference, however, between disagreeing with arguments, positions and actions, and engaging in ad hominem attacks. (Waht she can use such wording against me, and then I get in trouble and warned for responding with exact hyperlinks and that with respect irregardless of her disrespect. Hmm Strange moderation
Can I ask if someone using the expression " Hey sh!t-stick. idiot. .... Eat sh!t." is accepatble civil discussion HERE, Because jusy yesterday it was used against me, on the other thread.
So do consider warning All if you warn some., and do use the same standard for ALL not just for some or one.
You are not privy to all moderator actions and discussion, I'd like to kindly request that you leave forum moderation to the moderators. As for the ad hominems against you, Jack has
been called on this sort of thing in past.
This forum is not a free for all, and we do require that participants adhere to certain policies. (Does that go for Jack as well...) Disregard for this can lead, for example, to temporary or permanent banning at the mods' discretion. However, disciplinary actions such as these are not typically discussed publicly for privacy reasons. If you have concerns about the moderation of these forums, we request that you send a private message with your concerns to the Moderator user account. Please note, however, that due to time constraints not all correspondence is responded to.(SEE Jacks remarks. Do theyreflect moderaters standards. There it is Open and above Board. and you can respond above board and in the OPEN. I am not much into hidden secretive family type leadership meetings of excommunication. Been there having been done by them in this way. I like openness and honesty, as all have seen the problems of Jacks comments...and yet you still have not openly told himto reframe. Right ? Right. So I shall give you a chance .)
Walker, it seems you may not be speaking for ALL or all moderaters when you suggest that you only tolerate me and yet don't welcome me.
Moderators are allowed to speak for themselves. (And swear and call others names ???) Based on your interations with many of the members here it is apparant that not all have welcomed you. (Yes I am a Cgristian missionary and may not be welcome HERE...as most EXers boards are unChristian I realize that. Sio if you want to kick me out for being Christian oriented so be it. Just be honest and say so and admit to such. I can bring a lot to the table in explaining why the Family is the way they are. And have brought them down without any help from exers, so the choice is yours. You don;t get stronger by deleting good input. I and we have talked about Family werrors for years and could be a great help if you want help. the choice is yours, otherwise you might continue to just **** **** ******. ) it would be worth considering why this is and what can be done to try to make exchanges here less caustic and more enjoyable for all. (Yes ask Jack why he was so vile and that uncalled for and ubncivil. Jack is here, ask Him to reframe and get under control.)