Member since June 6, 2008

SteveP phil

My Profile

SteveP phil
  • Posts: 19
  • Location:
  • Occupation:
No Profile

My Recent Posts

 
Mon 9 Jun, 2008 12:35 am - Ah, thank you very much! these will help me tonight. I appreciate all your help! (view)
Sun 8 Jun, 2008 10:02 pm - well Thanks for the help, do you have a copy of a scratchpad you used? My test is tomorrow and I'd at least like to see how you went about TRYING those other two. :D (view)
Sat 7 Jun, 2008 11:42 pm - Hello Mr. Spoon! Any progress on those toughies? -Josh (view)
Sat 7 Jun, 2008 01:48 am - yeah, ~ is negation . is a conjunction horseshoe is a "in then" statement. the / triple dot is the conclusion. (view)
Sat 7 Jun, 2008 12:34 am - Ah, thank you justin! (view)
Fri 6 Jun, 2008 05:28 pm - Yes, we have gone over conditional proofs. And I thank you very much for putting you time in and helping me figure out whats going on with these guys. (view)
Fri 6 Jun, 2008 04:51 pm - yes, the . is an "and" symbol ( but, yet, although, however, still, etc.) (view)
Fri 6 Jun, 2008 04:45 pm - I assume that the --> you wrote is the horseshoe symbol I used? (view)
Fri 6 Jun, 2008 04:44 pm - Yeah, she said that Conditional Proofs are Ok. and also IP's I'm gonna try and figure out what you did there. :D (view)
Fri 6 Jun, 2008 02:24 pm - That sounds excellent. If you would include what lines you used on what rules (i.e. [1,3 MP] - lines one and three, rule modes ponens) that would really help me understand how you figured it out. (view)
 
  1. Philosophy Forum
  2. » SteveP phil
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 07/13/2025 at 11:26:46