Mon 15 Mar, 2010 11:45 pm - Yeah, I named that in the first post.
However, the difference is that the scenario in "Brains in a Vat" is the deception of human minds, so the human mind does exist. I am talking about... (view)
Mon 15 Mar, 2010 11:36 pm - Robot interprets Life
Our lives = Life
Life - acknowledge consciousness, therefore existence
But the reality is that the robot is the grand deceiver of all of this. Life exists dependent of the... (view)
Mon 15 Mar, 2010 11:08 pm - Through my first sentence, I was stating that through all that is possible, I do not see why an AI being is not able to fool his or her self into thinking that they are conscious. (view)
Mon 15 Mar, 2010 10:53 pm - In the realm of all that is possible, I don't find that to be the case.
I am primarily building this argument on the foundation that it is possible that all of us MAY have been incorrectly... (view)
Mon 15 Mar, 2010 10:39 pm - But what if advanced AI (beyond our time, again, refer to the Matrix) is perceiving the concept of consciousness itself? What if the AI is fooling itself into thinking it is conscious because it is... (view)
Mon 15 Mar, 2010 10:34 pm - ^Bingo. That leads me back to the Radical Skeptical Scenario
Consider the Matrix. One supreme AI entity controlling human minds (I hope that isn't a spoiler for you).
It is also possible... (view)
Mon 15 Mar, 2010 10:27 pm - But are robots conscious to begin with? That's what confused me in class.
I asked my professor if AI is considered conscious and he said no, the reason being that an iPhone cannot acknowledge... (view)
Mon 15 Mar, 2010 10:08 pm - Of course, that's what I'm saying. Descartes was saying all things that think exist with a conscious (I believe). If robots don't have a conscious but can think, then I believe that... (view)
