Mon 17 Nov, 2008 09:44 am - validity said:
What is the best practice for reducing the human population near the year 2600 or hindering its exponential growth a few hundreds years before this date?
Mon 17 Nov, 2008 09:28 am - Khethil said:
By understanding and acknowledging the concepts and their natures, we:
[*]Abolish polarized thinking by accepting the possibility that altrustic acts, while... (view)
Mon 17 Nov, 2008 07:35 am - Khethil, thank you for your post. It [i]does[/i] clear up a few things, but I still take issue with it. I will elaborate as I go.
Understanding that each individual has... (view)
Sun 16 Nov, 2008 09:50 pm - Didymos Thomas said:
Maybe you could think about what I said before you reply?
Actually, I did think about what you said. And I concluded that you were either: very silly,... (view)
Sun 16 Nov, 2008 09:28 pm - Ruthless Logic said:
Please, please tell me you are not serious?[/quote]
I'm quite serious and you have yet to respond directly to the arguments and questions I made earlier:
Sun 16 Nov, 2008 09:24 pm - paulhanke said:
.. it seems to me that your assertion "If you are an [U]atheist[/U] based on your experience with [U]Christianity[/U], then you are a [B]idiot[/B]" strongly... (view)
Sun 16 Nov, 2008 09:16 pm - [I]OM: "I disagree. An atheist, by definition, is someone who does not believe in a god / higher power / supernatural intelligence / etc.[/I]
In [I]a[/I] God, ect."
Sun 16 Nov, 2008 09:05 pm - Ruthless Logic said:
I did respond, look at pg 19.[/quote]
I said you did not respond "directly" to my comments.
Replying to my post is not [u]responding directly[/u] to my... (view)