Wed 18 Mar, 2009 12:35 am - I approve of the bile. And the hint of misanthropy. Third, you can write: they must know how to pick them at SUNY; either that or I've just been bumping into the wrong kind of computer... (view)
Fri 13 Mar, 2009 08:25 am - Thank you for the warm greetings, Thaeatetus.
"Mr. Fight the Power", do you mean (by way of saying 'hi'): have I read Habermas or am I just pretending? :) Or did you want to... (view)
Fri 13 Mar, 2009 05:07 am - Well, indeed. Zizek is famous for self-plagiarising, but "How to read Lacan" is almost continuous Zizek-self plagiarism. I think "Looking Awry" + "Enjoy your... (view)
Fri 13 Mar, 2009 05:04 am - I like your Kierkegaard partisanship!
Actually, I have to admit that Kierkegaard is kind of a blank spot for me. I've read a few of his books, but I confess that the whole interlocking... (view)
Fri 13 Mar, 2009 02:50 am - "How to Read Lacan" is for good or ill a massive collection of extracts from other books by Zizek arranged, if one were being uncharitable arbitrarily. Not bad 'though. (view)
Fri 13 Mar, 2009 02:39 am - Ah, the Chewbacca defense. Sublime. It can't help but kill this thread 'though.
I mean, who could possibly top THAT?!?. Is that why Gosh, has taken to bravely, but doubtless,... (view)
Fri 13 Mar, 2009 02:32 am - Even though Zizek should not (especially these days) be taken for being Lacan, I do think that his (early) work is probably the best way to get into Lacan. Something like "Looking Awry"... (view)
Fri 13 Mar, 2009 02:20 am - Dear Mr. Emerita,
Can I begin by mentioning that I'm a big fan of that thing you did with "A" and "B", and the papers in the desk? You are, verily, as I once... (view)
