Member since May 30, 2009


My Profile

  • Posts: 6
  • Location:
  • Occupation:
No Profile

My Recent Posts

Tue 2 Jun, 2009 07:28 pm - Silly me I forgot to mention that the hypothesis were assumed to be true. Given that the hypothesis are true and the proof is valid, the argument is therefore sound. (view)
Mon 1 Jun, 2009 06:10 pm - To build on VideCorSpoon's point of the purpose of translating english into logic say you have the very hairy looking argument made by a lawyer in a court room: "If my client is guilty,... (view)
Sun 31 May, 2009 10:26 am - (=x) will be there exists some x (\/x) will be for all x (=x)(\/y)[[Bx AND Ax] AND [(Bx AND Ax AND Cx') AND (By AND Ay -> Dy)] -> [Bx AND Cx' AND Dx]] I am new to this stuff so my... (view)
Sun 31 May, 2009 09:43 am - I think it might be the following... 1)Anyone is accepted as stated before... Members [B]OR [/B]nonmembers. 2)No one is accepted... Members [B]AND[/B] nonmembers. (The person has to be both at the... (view)
Sat 30 May, 2009 09:32 pm - An advertisement for a restraunt in an exclusive club in Honolulu says: Memebers and nonmembers only. What are two interpretations of this statement? (view)
Sat 30 May, 2009 09:01 pm - Hey all, Just wanted to introduce myself and thank everyone in advance for their help! -humphrz (view)
  1. Philosophy Forum
  2. » humphrz
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 04/21/2024 at 12:35:07