Fri 23 Jul, 2010 11:39 am - ughaibu,
I'm sorry Ughaibu. I was trying to reconcile what I perceived to be odd implications, but I now think that I was horribly mistaken on something that led me astray.
Fri 23 Jul, 2010 08:26 am - [quote="ACB"]
[quote="fast"]Assuming that there are 1a) statements about laws of nature and 1B) laws of nature, (inventions and discoveries respectively), and assuming that... (view)
Fri 23 Jul, 2010 07:30 am - Wayne,
Here's another example. My friend can jump four (4) feet off the ground from a standing position. I told him that I can jump forty (40) feet off the ground from a standing... (view)
Thu 22 Jul, 2010 08:19 am - [quote="ughaibu"]Then cite a different source, one which agrees with you. [/QUOTE]I don't need a source to agree with me. The point was to explain to you what I was saying.... (view)
Thu 22 Jul, 2010 08:00 am - [quote="wayne"] By that same logic, there remains a span of time, however infinitisimly small, that even aliens could not have beamed the plane up without reversing time.
Are you... (view)
Wed 21 Jul, 2010 02:30 pm - [quote="fast"]What the expressions are expression of, of course, can’t be disproved, for they are not the discoverable things of the world that the expressions are about.[/quote]The... (view)
Wed 21 Jul, 2010 02:08 pm - [quote="ughaibu"]
[quote="fast"]run the risk of you suggesting (again) that I am stupid.[/quote]Read what you've written. How could any reader not conclude that you are... (view)
Wed 21 Jul, 2010 12:49 pm - [quote="ughaibu"]
[quote="fast"]Those two points fail to support my position that laws of science are discovered.[/quote]And?
[/quote]Oh come now. Remember, your posts are... (view)
Wed 21 Jul, 2010 12:40 pm - [quote="ughaibu"]
[quote="fast"]Laws of science were discovered.[/quote]Really? Okay, give me an example.
This is from Wikipedia:
"The laws of science are... (view)