@JN1,
Welcome JN1!
"? this freedom will be the freedom of all. It will loosen both the master and slave from their chains. For
by a divine paradox, wherever there is one slave there are two. So in the wonderful reciprocities of being, we can never reach the higher levels until all our fellows ascend with us.There is no true liberty for the individual except as he finds it in the liberty of all. There is no true security for the individual except as he finds it in the security of all."
Gotta love Edward Markham. It probably means that "freedom" is a matter of pure equality. I would think that the divine paradox means that the fact that one man would be held in bondage by another underlines the notion that both suffer in an essential way. The slave suffers imprisonment while the master suffers the divine ethical violation. Until we look at freedom in terms of pure equality? we can never move forward. Or so I think.
Interestingly enough, the implication of "divine paradox" is used a lot in philosophy. Democritus for example used "by divine paradox" is his conception of atoms and the void (implicitly, not explicitly). Maybe Markham borrowed the notion.
But still welcome! I'm sure the forum will benefit from all of the questions you have collected over the years. As to your struggle with religious and scientific notions? good luck. I wouldn't touch that with a ten foot pole. LOL!