@markoos,
im probably missing alot... but I tend to think its not healthy to try to categorize and lump everything... i mean is this totally irrelevant but doesnt opinion and/or logic have any pull on stuff like this... OK yeah a triangle is a three sided shape but TECHNICALLY is there such thing as a 2d triangle whether isoceles scalene or equilateral? I mean dont we live in 3 dimensions and no matter how slight, things have a depth, width and height... so what would you say about a piece of pizza... is it triangular even though the outside is a curve? I dunno... I just mean to challenge the purpose of categorizing triangles like that... what good does it truly do...
12 can be made of 11+1, or even 15-3.... so i mean why bother guessing at stuff like this and calling it analytic or synthetic... **** itd probably do good for them to add a few categories like anasyn for stuff like when the fastest route is going a straight line until you find out theres construction in your way....
seriously what good is the fastest route is a straightline when theres just no way to travel straight. I mean even in airplanes it can be faster to go slightly off course and ride the jet stream...
ok i know im weird and im not stickin to the priori thing... but it aggrivates me when things have to be this or that.. and not just be or even at least just be circumstantial
what would emotion be?
analytic or synthetic...
and isnt EVERYTHING falsifiable...
what if i said hey i drew a triangle! and your like ok thats analytic... but then you look at my paper and seen i drew a square and must of had a horrible education... UH OH the analytic has been falsified!