oh no, here goes...
No, you do... nothing implies nothing.
That is your argument.
I do NOT assume the quantum field is nothing. LOL
Comprehension problems here.
I have updated my proof with the following to help those who are inexperienced in logic;
First we should discuss what logical tautology is; A statement which is necessarily true because, by virtue of its logical form; having no external premises, it cannot be used to make a false assertion, and is true in all possible circumstances. In propositional calculus a tautology is a formula that is true under any possible valuation of it's propositional variables. A tautology's negation is a contradiction, a propositional formula that is false regardless of the truth values of its propositional variables.
We see here that the foundation of all truth appeals to the law of non-contradiction; the first principle; "For the same (characteristic) simultaneously to belong and not belong to the same (object) in the same (way) is impossible." - Aristotle, Meta ta physica. This principle is the expression of consistency. Any defining and reasoning in any language on any topic assumes it a priori. It cannot be doubted, as all doubting is based on inconsistency, which assumes consistency a priori.
logical proofs don't necessitate truth outside the boundaries of the proof itself, so even if you can logically prove God that doesn't have any bearing on whether he ACTUALLY exists.
Aedes correctly points out that there is a certain gap between any logical conclusion and existence
For those who feel that logic in a vacuum somehow can prove something about the external world. But if you look closely, people who PROVE something using logic are almost certainly just rationalizing a pre-existing belief. In this way it becomes a kind of highly precise sophistry.
I certainly disagree with the notion that logical necessity is irrelevant to the phenomenal world.
If my proof is correct... then all necessary truth is isomorphic to the existence of empirical facts; because information is necessarily endomorphically mapped in reality.
Morphism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Isomorphism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Endomorphism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I demonstrate this empirical relevance and verification with the induction section as well as the causal mechanism for mind matter interactions and the peer reviewed research papers that demonstrate it.
The issue here is that, if consciousness is a fundamental property of reality (and not an epiphenomena of material structures) then a causal mechanism for mind matter interactions over space and time is a logical necessity.
Materialistic interpretations of reality cannot include the nonphysical phenomena I have demonstrated as a logical necessity and empirical fact.
Thus making my proof quite relevant to the phenomenal world.