Paper Help !!! Anything is helpful

Get Email Updates Email this Topic Print this Page

Reply Sun 25 Jan, 2009 11:21 am
Friendly reminder...

jgweed wrote:
This forum, requested by several Members, is reserved for students asking for specific help in reading and writing philosophy, and not for the expression of opinions or Member discussions of a more general nature; the latter are best placed in the other forums. Please try to limit one question to a post wherever possible.

Inappropriate posts or replies made here will either be moved to more appropriate forums or deleted at the discretion of the Staff.
Reply Sun 25 Jan, 2009 11:50 am
Recall my argument says nothing about the suffering of animals being related to a wider evil. The conclusion I arrived at, viz. the OP's problems, is that the way our system works means that what we perceive as natural evil is really necessary, and required, for natural good; that is, the suffering of deer caught in a mudflow, while deplorable, is less deplorable than the lack of the Earth's existence prohibiting the existence of the deer in the first place. In other words: 1. The suffering of animals (and of people) due to natural causes is tragic. 2. This same suffering is not evil--unless you would rather we not exist in the first place?

Copyright © 2020 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.02 seconds on 07/10/2020 at 05:31:09