Get Email Updates • Email this Topic • Print this Page
Wayne just read my second link, I just lost brain cells reading that article.
This organization is world wide educating kids that MAN and DINOSAURS coexisted!
I thought the dark ages were over.. guess I was wrong![]()
It's distributing seeing stuff like this and especially seeing so called "intelligent" scientist with degrees and PhD's also claiming that the earth is 6000 years old.
Please check out this website.
Answers in Genesis - Creation, Evolution, Christian Apologetics
I have to say, man kind is doomed!
What does a person have to go psychologically to proclaim that the universe is 6000 year old?
I can't see the logic these so called "scientist" are adopting?
Please check out this website.
Answers in Genesis - Creation, Evolution, Christian Apologetics
I have to say, man kind is doomed!
What does a person have to go psychologically to proclaim that the universe is 6000 year old?
I can't see the logic these so called "scientist" are adopting?
What is going on?
There is even a flat earth society!
---------- Post added 04-17-2010 at 05:20 PM ----------
"The Bible says that earth was created before the stars and that trees were created before the sun"
Chapter 10: Does the Big Bang Fit with the Bible? - Answers in Genesis
Someone explain to me how Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, wave-particle duality (more specifically, wavefunctions), special relativity, and even the Big Bang itself leaves no room for God. I will bet your best efforts cannot close the gap which God supposedly resides within.
Yes but you're not a young-earth creationist, though (are you?) It is one thing to interpret the bible and uncover its symbolic, allegorical truths, another to take it literally, which in my view is worse than not reading it at all.
Please check out this website.
Answers in Genesis - Creation, Evolution, Christian Apologetics
I have to say, man kind is doomed!
What is going on?
"The Bible says that earth was created before the stars and that trees were created before the sun"
Chapter 10: Does the Big Bang Fit with the Bible? - Answers in Genesis
It only said that MANKIND has existed in a roughly 6,000 year timeline, which is a different claim altogether; and there is plenty of room for scientific error concerning the rise of man..
I don't accept simply naturalist account of the origin of life either, because I think life itself is inherently miraculous, a divine spark. I think there is far more at work in the evolution of species than the several factors proposed by Darwinism. I suppose Christians would regard me as a pantheist - so be it. But I would never dispute the empirical facts of the descent of man, which puts H Sapiens at somewhere in the vicinity of 50,000 years, descended from Australopithecus at around 5 million years ago. But there is plenty of scope within the bare scientific narrative for the spiritual imagination. That ought to be the playing field.
We don't know what life is. We have a theory of how organisms evolve. I am not positing 'an outside intelligent agent'. Besides I think your (and many other people's) notion of 'God' is a fabrication mainly based on your dislike of religion. I don't presume to have an theory of the nature of God. What I do think is that natural law operates on many levels beyond the merely physical. There are laws of manifestation, laws of attraction, the law of karma, in addition to the laws the science has begun to describe.
But it is interesting to reflect on where reason, design, intention, and intelligence begin. It seems to me that if you take the materialist/naturalist view, then all of these attributes spring into existence with H Sapiens, more or less fully formed. But where did they come from? If there is no design in the universe, save for the designs which us clever humans make with our hands, then how did we evolve the ability to design anything?
I also think the naturalist view is a way of ego preserving a sense of its own supremacy. Ego is terrified of the idea that there might actually be a moral law in the universe, because then there might be something other than its own designs which it has to take into account.