@Krumple,
Krumple;135002 wrote:Well I think you are wanting to find something because you are looking for a pattern. Just like a person laying back on the ground during a partially cloudy day sees all sorts of shapes and objects within the clouds. If you look hard enough you can turn a triangle into any possible three combination of things.
For the triangle you are proposing to even work, first you would have to sell me on the idea that a god or gods exist. So far there is nothing that I find satisfying to say that any such thing exists. So there goes one point of your triangle right there. If you collapse that point then all the other points pretty much lose their meaning as well.
I understand your doubts. The triangle is just a symbol.. Let me ask you this..
Do you think that man's consciousness is structured? You probably do, for you are probably like me, a scientific type. In fact, I would be impressed if you are as hard core an atheist as
I was, and really still am. Yes, I'm a
total atheist in the usual sense of the word, more than I was a week ago.
Hegel discovered the foundation of logic and language. It's that simple. And it's structure is well represented by a cross or a triangle. Why? It's really quite simple. Man's mind, as Kant saw, structures its perception. It does this in two basic ways. Ideal geometry is an example of the first. We can't help but think of space in a particular way. In fact, we can't not think of space. The best we can do is think of empty space.
Kant knew this much.. But I don't think Kant knew the other transcendental, but perhaps I just haven't got that far. In any case, Hegel
did know the other transcendental. And this transcendental is digital. We can't help but think of things as unities, or wholes. Even to think of pieces is to think of wholes. We can zoom in or out, but it's always unities.
All Hegel realized was that all religion was a misunderstanding of the human mind. The real is rational, because man is compulsively or transcendentally rational. By rational, I mean numerical,to speak loosely. (I'll complete this if you are interested, as it is tough). And this rationality is also at the core of language, or words. Like I said, we can only think in unities. Period.
But when we try to apply our digital thought to our transcendental geometry, we find that it doesn't work. That there is an infinity of numbers between any two numbers you choose. We can see in continuity, but we can only think in objects. Man is the collision of these two ways of experience reality, and nothing else. Except that this collision makes language possible, which allows us to culturally evolve.
Hegel is as scientific as the law of gravity. He's a thorough guy. He's just hard to understand. But he's the guy who found the foundation of logic & language itself.
In his view, we must accept our mortality in order to see the structure of our being. He also sees what Jung saw, that there is a sort of spiritual
itch in us. And this is the source of human progress in
every sense of the word. This itch is pure negativity, which cannot be conceived, but only represented imperfectly within our language. And wisdom is nothing but recognizing all of this.