@Karpowich,
Knowledge does not only reside in the brain though. It also resides in the body and the whole nervous system. If you look into the state of current neuro science, it is clear that the brain is nothing like a digital storage unit with a 1:1 relationship between concepts and objects. Whenever you think, many different neural networks in the brain fire up, in very unpredictable ways. And should (worst luck) you suffer a brain injury, the brain, or something, will work out ways to re-route the pathways, given enough time.
We had a debate last year where neuro guy produced a study which purported to show neural patterns that represented images. My response was, these are 'images' only in the context of a live brain, in a nervous system. If you show patterns of dots on an x-ray film and claim that it is an image, this too is referring to a framework which includes the device that captured the images, and your ability to interpret them and posit them as representations of images.
The Decade of the Brain, which ended in 2001, provided a huge wealth of research, information and theorising, but also failed to answer very many basic questions about the nature of the brain, how it processes information, and how any of it adds up to a simple thought.