Law of thinking I&II and the six elements of thinking

It is an axiom that the principle of human's thinking must be th(sth.)=i. The meaning of thinking is the unique way for any communication between the world of spirit and the world of substance. This is an axiom too. But the law of existence of thinking is not an axiom. Axiom refers to something that can hardly be proved but no needed to be proved as almost everybody agree with it. Axiom is quite a common concept in Geometry, for example if you linked a fixed point with any other point (fixed or moving), you must draw out a line then. No ratiocination is suitable. Of course it lacks visible and convincing evidence too (keep on drawing lines crazily is not a convincing but a "mad evidence", though visible on the paper, I supposed). But the law of thinking I is an inductive conclusion. Nor can it be proved by the pure and direct deductive reasoning, but can be proved by several sensible evidences. This law suggests that thinking exist anywhere and anytime in our daily life. Different from the two axioms before, we can really find some daily example as evidence. But as a rationalist, I must emphasize that this is not a good reasoning. The conclusion of inductive reasoning can only be "probably true" but not "necessarily true", unlike the deductive reasoning. But we have no choice. In the analysis of thinking, both deduction and induction are necessary.

As I have asked before, does a common system of thinking exist? It should exist, I think. The system of thinking should be fixed, or else the finding of a common principle of the thinking is meaningless. We have already known that the process of thinking must be the same, however it seems that we cannot infer a valid conclusion about the existence of a common system of thinking.

The TFS wants to find a common system of thinking and make a simplified interception. But before this we have to prove the existence of a common system of thinking, as letting a hypothesis as a basis of a new reasoning without proving is not wise enough, unless there is no choice. As the most fundamental basis is just a hypothesis, if it is denied, the whole theory collapsed. But deductive reasoning seems to be impossible. The only method is inductive reasoning then. That's why this time we are going to discuss about the law of thinking II.

The law of thinking II suggesting that there are six fundamental elements exist in human thinking: creativity, desire, emotion, feeling, memory and logic. Therefore this is also called as hexa-taxonomy. Let's explain the reasoning of each element:

Firstly, creativity. It is the origin of all artificial concepts and ideas. All human can create some concepts and ideas, though somebody may be weak in innovation. Once you come up with something new, for example you suddenly come up with the idea to hide a frog in your teacher's drawer to make her feel scared. This is a consequence of creativity. Creativity feels like a producing machine of thinking.

Creativity is very important in the innovation of Visible Art, Music and Literature. But actually In Mathematics, Natural Science and Social Science, even daily living, creativity is necessary.

Secondly, desire. It is the fundamental force of all human action, including thinking which is the origin pf action. Everybody has got their own desire. This is not a new idea. Thomas Hobbes had the same suggestion already. It is easy to experience the effect of Desire in our daily life, from the physiological one like desire to eat to the psychological one like sexual desire. Without desire we have no force to do anything, even thinking. It can be classified as two: possessiveness and satisfaction. The former refers to a urge in occupying something instead of sharing (which must somehow offends the other's the same desire. For example two girls fall in love with a boy at the same time, and their possessiveness must offend the other's), whilst the latter means an urge in satisfying your own wish only (which doesn't offend the other's desire directly).

Possessiveness can be classified as curiosity, sovereignty and privacy. Satisfaction can be classified as physiological and psychological. Desire is necessary for everybody, though it may be the most difficult element for analysis compared to the other. Even doing mathematical exercise requires desire of curiosity about the answer of the question (though many students lack such a desire). Of course curiosity is one kind of desire, and so does Desire feels like a starter of thinking.

[Moderator edit: sexually explicit graphic removed. jgw]
Sexual Desire is a kind of phychological sacrifaction, as it doesn't tend to occupy anything without sharing, generally speaking.

Thirdly, emotion. It assists or forms all expressions. Even a rational person have emotion. It helps us explain something that can never be explained by rationality, for example your feelings about a sentences full of f-word. It seems to be less important but it is necessary for our daily expression, especially in our informal and spoken language (sometimes in formal and written language too). Without emotion we just look like robots. Emotion feels like a monitor of thinking.