@pam69ur,

Quote:

Is this the direction you are going?

no

what i am saying is systems that are incomplete ie that have unprovable statements in them ie ZFC cannot prove anything

because

statements give mutual inferential support to each other. This

condition is met by mathematical systems thus they are holistic

as a corollary

Thus a systems statements face the tribunal of proof as a corporate

body of statements. A systems statements about mathematics face the

tribunal of proof not individually but only as a corporate body

the statements in a system are interconnected

if one statement is wrong them the system cant prove anything

also

if one statement cant be proven then likewise the system cant prove anything